×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pump Suction

Pump Suction

Pump Suction

(OP)
Hi, I'm new to Eng-Tips and I'm looking for a bit of advise.

I'm trying to calculate head loss in my suction system and I'm having second thoughts about how to calculate this through a small part of a perforated "stinger". I'm perforating a HDPE pipe with 375-1.25" holes (to meet 3x the area of the suction line which is 14.005" and double as a strainer - solid size pump can handle is 1.31"). I've looked and found K-values for pipe entrance (K=0.78) and used the formula

h_f = K * ( V^2 / 2g )

Which is what I've done for all of the other fittings. The flow rate is 3,000 gpm and I divided that among the 375 holes to find 8 gpm/ea. I used the 8 gpm to find V... 2.093 ft/s... to finally get h_f = 0.053 ft of head loss per hole. Multiplied by 375 holes gives me a head loss of more than 19'... this seems way high?

SO, I tried a second method using the Hazen and Williams Formula. This time I again split the flow to 8gpm per hole. For the length I used the thickness of the pipe, 0.941". This gave me a head loss of 0.00122' per hole - multiplied by 375 gives a much more reasonable number of 0.458'.

These two are so far off I just wanted a bit of advise if anyone has any?

To answer questions that I'm sure will arise - this 16" DR 17 pipe is left over from a previous job and we're trying to reuse them if the NPSHA is sufficient. The stinger is in an open pit and will be placed near horizontal 3' off of sump. Also, perforations will be made 360 deg around circumference of pipe.


Thanks in advance!

RE: Pump Suction

double t87

All your holes are in parallel so you only need work out the head loss from one. It doesn't matter if there is one hole at 8pm or 2000 holes at 8gpm, the head loss will be the same. At three times the surface area of the main pipe, the head loss through the holes will be very small compared to the head loss in the main 14" pipe.

The straight pipe length calculation will not be accurate as the losses are to do with entry and exit and an orifice calculation is probably closer to the truth.

You are over complicating this.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: Pump Suction

(OP)
LittleInch-

That's what I was afraid of... this is my first time designing a suction system and we're pulling out of a pit that's relatively deep and I want to ensure that I have plenty of NPSH to avoid tearing up the pump. I didn't think about all of them being in parallel. Thanks for the reply.

RE: Pump Suction

Always do a qualitative analysis of an unfamiliar problem or equation. More holes would lead to more losses, and that doesn't make sense. More holes means fewer losses, so right there you know that something isn't right with the approach.

What are you trying to keep out with the strainers? Be aware that pumps are rated for max sphere size that can pass through. If you get a 2" long bolt through your 1.25" strainer holes, it will still tear up the pump. Start up with a temporary strainer that is considerably smaller than the max sphere size. Don't think you're 100% safe just because the hole size is smaller than the max sphere size. Most of the stuff you're trying to keep out is not going to be round.

RE: Pump Suction

(OP)
1gibson-

Thanks for your response. I'm trying to keep out primarily rocks. However, I hadn't considered bolts/studs or anything long with a dia. less than 1.25". This is out in a field near a caliche pit and I'm concerned about rocks blowing into and settling in the sump of the pit. I did look into a temporary start-up strainer, however, the possibility of rocks steered me to a permanent screen/strainer. Would you suggest not perforating the suction "stinger". Again, I'm new to suction design so any pointers are appreciated! Thanks!

RE: Pump Suction

If the rocks get into an HDPE hole they may wedge in there and stick, it's a soft material. I don't think that's an effective strategy. I'd go with a big wire mesh basket type strainer, maybe 0.5" square openings.

RE: Pump Suction

(OP)
Ok great. Thank you guys for all of your help - I appreciate it!

RE: Pump Suction

You also need to consider what you are pumping and what could be entrained in the inflow as well as what could be accidently introduced into the sump.
What are you pumping?

It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. (Sherlock Holmes - A Scandal in Bohemia.)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources