×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Wall of Windows (Part II)

Wall of Windows (Part II)

Wall of Windows (Part II)

(OP)
The previous thread on window walls has been closed so I've had to create a new thread to continue this discussion.

Apparently, these type of tall walls full of windows is the norm around here and not the exception (Ocean Shores Washington, beach homes). My most recent project involves a tall wall with windows as shown below:



I immediately went with a 2x8 stud wall due to the height and figured PSL columns in the wall should be the solution. After running the numbers I tentatively arrived at a 5-1/4"x7" PSL column for P4. The column in question, and the most critical column, is between both columns of windows and is approximately 22' tall. As far as strength I am good (40% in bending and 41% combined bending/axial), my concern is regarding the deflection at this column (midspan). According to my calculations using Forte I get a deflection of L/192 or approximately 1.38" at midspan. Typically I don't like to see a deflection over 0.5" (my hard deflection limit) but maybe this limit is unrealistic given the parameters and height of this wall.

Per the IBC/IRC deflection limits I should be okay (L/180 for gypsum walls) but a wall flexing in and out more than an inch seems highly problematic to me. I really don't want to go to a 2x10 stud wall but that may be my only option as I've pretty much reached the upper limit of wood performance with the PSL columns.

Has anyone integrated tried integrating steel columns into these type of walls?

Does anyone have any good resources on tall wall design and other tricks of the trade related to tall columns in walls that are controlled by deflections?

A confused student is a good student.
Nathaniel P. Wilkerson, PE
www.medeek.com

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

Did you (or forte) take a 30% reduction in deflection for wind?
I have used tube steel or flitch plates in these before and it worked out nicely. I went to 2x10's on a recent one as it peaked at 29'

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

Medeek,

I am not sure your spacing for your 2x8 studs, however, if at 16" o/c, this could be reduced to 12" o/c, or I have also used 2 ply studs @ 16" o/c or 2 ply studs @ 12" o/c.

While I have used steel columns in the past, I am hesitant to do this unless you can get sufficient insulation all around the column. A cold column within a wall space can end up with large amounts of condensation within the wall cavity.

I would try to limit my deflection to a maximum of 1", I have done this in the past. Double studs may very well help in this matter. Consider deflection criteria for interior finishes (drywall, etc..), but also keep in mind that exterior finishes also can have some more stringent deflection criteria (i.e. brick, or in some cases, one of the more popular exterior stucco/insulation systems requires l/600).

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

I would use l/240, but you can get away with l/180 if it is just gyp. There a bend in plan at that wall so that will stiffen it up. A few more tricks: you can reduce C&C loading by 0.7 when calculating deflection. Also you do get partial composite action from osb. If you do the math, it makes a big difference. 1/2" deflection over 22' is no biggie. I wouldn't worry about it.

When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty but when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.

-R. Buckminster Fuller

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

I'd be willing to relax the absolute deflection limit. For lateral deflection of walls, I really do feel that curvature is the parameter of interest. Although I suppose that occupant comfort / terror factors in too.

It's a shame that there isn't a simple way to get flexural continuity across your horizontal members. The L/180 limit doesn't bother me much so long as all of the posts are travelling in the same direction at the same time with little differential movement.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

One additional consideration is window deflection. In this case, it is probably not an issue due to the smaller window dimensions so less differential deflection across each window. I did a wall a long time ago the windows were 12' tall and 4' wide. I believe the deflection criteria on those windows were L/360 or < 1/2".

I have run into tall column issues before and being in the upper Midwest, thermal transfer is always a concern. Usually we can take it by increasing column size, but I just had this thought pop into my head. Maybe it would be worth exploring. The steel wouldn't help as much for outward pressures, but those are "usually" significantly lower than inward forces. The wood "blocking" would be designed to take outward pressures and would be trimmed down an amount to allow the steel to be recessed into the wall system a small amount.

Thoughts on this "idea"?

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

@Canuck;

Does IRC specify L/600 for brick w/ wood stud backup? This is common for metal stud backup, but wood is typically L/240 min as I recall (brittle finish). I don't think any of the stud-height tables in the IRC would actually work if it was L/600.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

@BadgerPE: I think that your idea slick! Why wouldn't it help for outward pressures? The moment of inertial of the assembly would be the same in both directions would it not?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

XRC,

Code in Canada (Ontario) calls for l/180 for drywall and exterior finishes not susceptible to cracking, and l/360 for brick/stone veneer on wood studs.

However, beyond Code, there are exterior stucco systems that specifically call for l/600 deflection limits in their product literature.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

I also agree that BadgerPE's detail is a great idea.

That is getting downloaded into the vault. There are always times to use something like that.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

@KootK: I was thinking more for strength provisions, but for deflection I agree with you regarding the moment of inertia.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

Strength rarely governs wood walls and columns for this type of application. It's normally a serviceability failure.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

@BadgerPE: I would think that the WT would be stronger for outward pressure as that would put the stem in tension. I imagine that we'd be uncomfortable using the wood blocking to brace the stem against buckling when in compression.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

@KootK: Good point.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

Good article on wall deflection.

http://www.structuremag.org/wp-content/uploads/201...

My understanding is that it's L/600 for CFS only - the wood guys made it that way to keep their competitor down

When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty but when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.

-R. Buckminster Fuller

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

KootK and Badger,

Why would you be uncomfortable using the wood blocking to brace the stem?

If you were to enact a bit of the sheathing through nails into adjacent studs and into the blocking I don't see why it can't provide the necessary bracing force. At least to account for some lower unbraced length.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

@Jayrod: I rescind my concern. I was thinking of local compression plate buckling of the stem tip. b/t ratio stuff will take care of that. I agree with considering the tee braced for LTB/column buckling.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

(OP)
Just to clarify the critical column is the one indicated below with its trib. area (wind load).



I could always go to a 7"x7" PSL.

A confused student is a good student.
Nathaniel P. Wilkerson, PE
www.medeek.com

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

Perhaps you could eliminate the column and double up the one to the right which is going to be buried in the wall.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

Go with a 7x7 and move on with life. You are not getting paid enough on these jobs. Wood framers usually hate steel, and they would rather alter the width of your shearwalls to fit the windows the owner wants if that is an option.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

Quote:

The steel wouldn't help as much for outward pressures, but those are "usually" significantly lower than inward forces

Hmm, according to ASCE 7, the C&C external pressure coefficients are larger for outward loads than inward loads.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

(OP)
I am tending to agree with Brad805, the structure will in no way fail and as KootK noted the curvature is probably more the issue than the absolute deflection. A 7"x7" PSL column buys me another 3/8" of deflection:



I'm not sure if its worth it but the L/256 does look a lot better.

My real concern (valid or not) is the differential deflection between the columns. Due to the nature of the geometry of the V-shaped wall the center columns (P3) will be lateral braced against each other and their deflection will probably be quite a bit less than 0.5 inches even though my initial calcs showed them deflecting 1.16" (unbraced from each other), the P5 columns also came in at about 0.56" of deflection due to a lower column height and smaller trib. area. With the other columns on each sides of the windows only deflecting about 1/2 and inch and the column between the windows potentially deflecting a full inch how does the whole wall hang together and will the windows break or pop out?

Hence the strapping at the headers.

My thinking is that the whole wall will act like a large web to some extent and header straps will load up in tension with a large lateral wind load, which will help distribute the load and deflection into the stiffer columns from P4. I'm not sure if one can quantify this "web" action and if it really makes much difference to the overall differential deflections among the columns.

A confused student is a good student.
Nathaniel P. Wilkerson, PE
www.medeek.com

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

Your concern regarding differential deflection is exactly why I suggested eliminating the intermediate columns and doubling up the end columns. You get some of the header continuity that I mentioned above. I think that it would create a more beneficial arrangement for the windows. More of that "web" behavior that we're gunning for.

This is probably KootK paranoia showing but I worry that, under some oblique wind angle gusting, you might actually get one post moving inwards and its neighbor moving outwards. If that came to pass, it would be the worst case scenario by far.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

(OP)
After a quick check in AutoCAD I might be overly worried here. The stretch of the windows with the above mentioned differential deflection is only 0.009", approximately 1/128 of an inch, I think we can manage with that.

The wall will go from flat (180 deg.) to 177.6 deg kink at the P4 column, will the drywall crease at this line?

A confused student is a good student.
Nathaniel P. Wilkerson, PE
www.medeek.com

RE: Wall of Windows (Part II)

(OP)
I would have liked to post this on the previous thread but it is closed. Here is the one wall of windows finished out. I think I would have done something a little more exciting with the trim around the windows but I did not do the design on this house.






A confused student is a good student.
Nathaniel P. Wilkerson, PE
www.medeek.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources