×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Precipitates in 316 Stainless Steel

Precipitates in 316 Stainless Steel

Precipitates in 316 Stainless Steel

(OP)
I am a welding engineer wrestling with an undetermined weld process problem involving 316L stainless steel.
Our company runs many mechanized longitudinal seam welders, GTAW-based, for the creation of custom tubes, tanks, etc.

We are intermittently experiencing what appear to be precipitates of some sort in autogenous, mechanized GTAW welds in 316L SS, .048” thick.
We are NOT experiencing this with 304 stainless of the same thickness, joint design, run the same day/time, etc.
Relative Humidity is @ 48%, temperature around 75-80F.

I have not done any metallographic studies but would welcome input on suspected causes. We have material certifications for this 316 material and am wondering if there might be a particular constituent percentage, that, while within spec limits, is something we may want to limit. The indication presents as a lifted (~.005-.010") "pad." The overall size of the defect in the first photo is approximately 1/16". Two photos are attached.
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.

Spainman007

RE: Precipitates in 316 Stainless Steel

These are on the welds?
They are slag, either from the shielding, or surface, or the interior of the 316.
Because of the Mo in 316 it is more sensitive than 304.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Precipitates in 316 Stainless Steel

(OP)
EdStainless:

Yes, they present on the face of the weld. We are using certified materials that are very well cleaned and prepared, so I am again looking for a culprit constituent; possibly more than one. You noted molybdenum making the weldment more sensitive. Do you mean it's more sensitive to slag formation because of the moly? Some of the research/application papers I have been reading indicate that some of the very low percentage constituents, when at their limit extremes, can increase the potential for voids, inclusions, and cracks. We see this intermittently, so I am hoping to identify the specific constituent or constituents and work with our suppliers to bring in materials within logical limits. Any additional input is appreciated.

RE: Precipitates in 316 Stainless Steel

This looks more like process related versus material. The GTAW torch arc length is varying.

RE: Precipitates in 316 Stainless Steel

I would feel that it is more likely weld method, gases, or surface cleanliness.
For it to be internal then you would have to have some real crap steel.
What is the S, Al, Cu, Ca, .... of which only S will be reported.

What you have isn't a void or precipitate in the structure. It is purely a surface anomaly.
Some surface conditions make the material almost impossible to clean. If it was pickled and not rinsed well there will be traces of Fl on it and you can not remove it.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources