INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Dispersion modeling and locating a rupture disk tail pipe exit

Dispersion modeling and locating a rupture disk tail pipe exit

(OP)
I have a new 10" rupture disk tail pipe to route, and specified it must be above the nearest building eve by 10 feet, and if an eve was within 20 ft, I requested the line be routed up past that higher roof eve on the "penthouse". I did it to maximize dispersion, for high velocity outflows and keep slow residual fumes from coming back down to grade between the buildings. I am receiving a lot of pushback, as if this is not needed and should only be justified by dispersion modeling.

It was my understanding that typical dispersion modeling was not intended to determine if such a penthouse could be ignored. fyi -- The penthouse is 40'W x40'D x 15'H and flush to the long wall on a 200' x 150' x 25' gable roof warehouse. Parallel to this wall about 50 ft away is a control room, some tanks, pipe rack and at the end of the wall, a smoke shack, so people go back and forth along this wall.

I realize I need a dispersion model to know where health effects, can reach, but is it meant to handle the situation described?

RE: Dispersion modeling and locating a rupture disk tail pipe exit

Doubling the height is likely to have more than a squared effect support design parameters, probably making your 20ft height impossible to design using the current diameter. You should be sure you need 20ft before specifying that height. Did you do any dispersion modelling at 10ft to prove that you do need it?

RE: Dispersion modeling and locating a rupture disk tail pipe exit

Any fixed distance / height rules are likely to be quite conservative as it has to look at the worst case.

It is a little difficult to work out your description and a sketch would be of more use, but dispersion modelling of different flows would seem to be required to show the impact at different flows, wind conditions temperatures etc.

Also depends on what it is you're potentially venting.

As for people, you can probably assume that if the BD goes off they will run away quite rapidly, so the low flow case may only need to consider entry into buildings.

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close