×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

(OP)
I've never really had a solid conviction on this, so I though that I'd get some opinions from some other site/civil folks working in the USA (or anywhere else, for that matter)...

ADA Standards and various building codes state that ramp landings shall not have a slope steeper that 2-percent in any direction. Accessible parking spaces also have similar wording. So, my question is this: Does that mean that the (two) cross slopes can be no greater than 2-percent, or does this really mean no greater than 2-percent in any direction? For a number of years now, I have taken a conservative approach and tried to design my ramp landings (or accessible parking spaces) so that the hypotenuse, if you will, of the cross slopes is a maximum of 2-percent (e.g. a 1.4-percent cross slope in either direction). There are times, however, when it sure would be nice to squeeze a little more elevation out of my designs.

How do others handle this? Thanks in advance.

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

A reviewer, who is the HC guru says and reviews it in all directions, this is also the way the inspectors for low income housing review it. More than 1 space has been repaved due to this approach.

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

I agree. 2% in ANY direction.

Promotes birdbaths --> failing asphalt, but there is generally no flexibility in the code.

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

ANY direction to be ADA compliant. Your hypotenuse approach is correct.

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

I think the OP was saying that his design was more stringent than the standard.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
[IMG http://tinyurl.com/7ofakss]
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers


Of course I can. I can do anything. I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
There is a homework forum hosted by engineering.com: http://www.engineering.com/AskForum/aff/32.aspx

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

No he's actually pushing it as far as he can..the resultant vector cannot exceed 1:48 (2.08%)

Use concrete for the spaces to mitigate ponding.

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

Agreed, 1:48 is the real limit. The standard really is ANY direction. Slopes in both directions can get complicated in construction so it's best to keep the design flat in one direction and 1.75-1.85% the other way for construction tolerance considerations.

A laser level can be laid in any direction to check the slope, not just N/S E/W.

Nate the Great

www.ceieng.com

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

The other quirk to this... is the gray area about designing a 5% walk with a 2% cross slope because it creates a diagonal 5.4% ramp with no landing.

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

Nice try Darth...The criterion for sidewalks is 1:48 perpendicular to the path of travel (cross slope)..

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

i've had to redesign because somebody on a town design review board with a scale bar saw my 1' contours were a little closer than 5' spaced and interpreted "path of travel" to not exclude a chair correcting their path on a 5' walk.... so... i'm sticking to my 'gray area' guns. :)

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

Sorry there is no gray area here..the 5% grade criterion is measured along the path of travel.



RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

I keep anything ADA at 2% and under in all directions. The story when I first started working about ripping out an entire parking lot because the ADA crew comes to check new construction at random made me never forget. Sue happy people out here.

The thing I can't stand is redoing a crosswalk ramp at the bottom of a steep sidewalk. The end result around here can be a more steep ramp.

B+W Engineering and Design | Los Angeles Civil Engineer and Structural Engineer http://bwengr.com

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

Not everything has to be less that 2% in all directions..You have ADA compliant ramps for example.

The 2% in all directions only applies to landings and parking spaces.

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

OP was talking about landings. I hope we know the different rules for ramps.

B+W Engineering and Design | Los Angeles Civil Engineer and Structural Engineer http://bwengr.com

RE: Accessible Ramps - 2% Slope In Any Direction

(OP)
Thanks to all who have taken the time to reply.

One of the things that precipitated this thread was that I was designing a parallel curb ramp for a sidewalk adjacent to a school access road - a road not in the public right-of-way. The FHWA publication entitled "Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access" states that "the installed slope of the gutter around the base of the curb ramp should be a minimum of 0.5 percent" since poor drainage at the bottom of a curb ramp is inconvenient and can result in the accumulation of debris or (in cold-weather locations) slush and ice. The same publication also states that the drainage slope of the gutter (i.e. the slope parallel to the curb and roadway) should not exceed 2 percent, and has several illustrations that depict the landing of a parallel curb ramp sloping towards the street at 2 percent. Putting two and two together (or, should I say, 2 percent and 2 percent), this would mean that the maximum slope of the landing in any direction would actually be 2.8 percent.

Now, I know that this is a curb ramp and not an accessible parking space or a ramp leading into a building. But the same drainage challenges exist for those situations and it just seems that, from a "big picture" perspective, the intent of the code for ramp landings and accessible parking spaces would mean that the cross-slopes can be no greater than 2 percent. Unfortunately, I fear that many inspectors would not be so broad-minded; hence the dilemma...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources