×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Effective Bearing Area

Effective Bearing Area

Effective Bearing Area

(OP)
Hello,

I am designing some shallow footings that rest on granular fill with vertical load and moment applied to them. Someone proposed to me that there is a limit to determining the effective area of the footing based on a maximum eccentricity of less than B/6 (or L/6). My understanding is that limiting this eccentricity to less than B/6 ensures that the footing has a trapezoidal load distribution and there will be no areas of zero bearing pressure on the footing.

Is there a reason that you cannot have an eccentricity larger than B/6? I have heard it is not recommended, however as long as there is no overall overturning on the footing as a result and the bearing pressure (considering effective area) is within the allowable limit, why can't you have the eccentricity exceed B/6?

Thanks!

RE: Effective Bearing Area

(OP)
As an addendum to this - I know there has been much discussion regarding factors to be used to foundation calculations and I hope I don't open a can of worms, but would it be correct to assume to use unfactored loads to determine the eccentricity?

RE: Effective Bearing Area

The middle third of the footing criteria (e < B/6) goes back to a triangular pressure diagram and no negative heel pressure as you noted. It is probably a good idea as a general rule but not necessary. There may be more structure deformation when pushing eccentricity limits though.

AASHTO LRFD has gone the way of using factored loads and calculating eccentricity from them which is kind of silly in my opinion. The criteria has been changed to B/4 or equivalent which no longer represents anything other than numbers. I think it is B/3 on rock also. Why would one want to calculate a dimension with a factored load is beyond me as the balance of forces is distorted. They seem to understand that it would be silly to calculate settlement with factored loads but eccentricity is ok.

I gave up a while back and just do what the code requires. Stop thinking and just do it is what LRFD becomes many times.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources