×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Circuit breaker - primary injection testing

Circuit breaker - primary injection testing

Circuit breaker - primary injection testing

(OP)
Hello,

Could you please share your experiences on primary injection tests for circuit breaker of high current ratings (say 1600 to 5000 Amps) with integral trip units. I can't see many commercially available test equipment capable of supplying the level of currents. Needless to say, true testing of short time or instantaneous settings is near to impossible.

I can understand the difficulty in generating such high currents (~2000 to 20000 Amps). I would like to understand what is the common practice of testing circuit breakers - especially the ones with high current ratings.

Thanks,

RE: Circuit breaker - primary injection testing

There are several manufacturers of primary injection test sets for the exact purpose you have.

Megger, Phoenix and Programma come to mind. In the old days of dash pot or thermal magnetic trip units this was a must.

Some will say (including NETA specifications) that primary injection is still required. There is a value to proving the entire CT>>Trip UNit> trip coil.

On the other hand there are also secondary test sets available for specific trip units, generally from the manufacturer.

There are methods, such as testing the unit at a much reduced current level (few hundred amps), with primary current, which proved the CT's, wiring and trip circuit, then testing the trip unit itself with a secondary test set, which can accomplish the same. It is how protection systems are tested for MV/HV systems all of the time (separate testing of the devices and perhaps a lower current primary test to prove the system 100%).

The primary test sets that are capable of 100-200 kA, are big monsters and generally require a connection to ~480 V to get that kind of output current (100kA+). In a shop situation, that can be set up quite efficiently, with various custom breaker stab sets to facilitate efficient testing. Doing this in the field is also possible, but it requires more logistics, transportation and manpower ($$$).

RE: Circuit breaker - primary injection testing

We have one custom built at the shop. Not easy to transport. 3 pieces , one transformer, one 5000:5 CT w auto-transformer and the injection module.
Max current is about 20000 A with good connections. Testing molded case breakers is easy, but one has to remove them from the panel first. Testing power circuit breakers is ok providing you have adapters to fit the stabs/clusters. Short and Instantaneous are tested at minimal setting. Only way to 100% test a newly retrofitted breaker w electronic trip unit.

Needless to say that at 20000 A, strange sounds keep people away from the area.

RE: Circuit breaker - primary injection testing

I fall out strongly in favor of primary injection testing.

Some manufacturers have secondary test sets that do some testing of the sensors, but most do not. The primary injection test makes the entire breaker do its job, including breaker opening, the trip unit, its sensors, etc. Not testing the sensors is a pretty serious omission.

This points out many common issues such as failed trip units, failed or incorrectly scaled sensors, and sticky mechanisms.

All of these assume that the technician performing the test knows how to properly test the breaker.

In some cases in the past, we did an initial test of circuit breakers using primary injection to prove out the system, then, after receiving the proper settings (much later in the project) we validated the settings using secondary injection.

old field guy

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources