×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Concrete Cube Test vs. Cylinder Test

Concrete Cube Test vs. Cylinder Test

Concrete Cube Test vs. Cylinder Test

(OP)
For those with the experience, is the concrete cylinder test more accurate/reliable than the concrete cube test? I had never heard of the concrete cube test but a client is requesting it on an international project. It seems very similar to the concrete in that it also tests compressive strength: http://www.qemsolutions.com/news/a-simple-guide-to...

RE: Concrete Cube Test vs. Cylinder Test

StructureMan44 -

What is the local material standard/method for testing and are you talking about laboratory prepared samples or site samples? Smaller saples have problems with coarse aggregates used or specified.

If the local method is for smaller cubes, you may not find a testing machine capable of conducting proper testing. The size of the compression area is very important. I had a situation where I needed some hollow 8x8x16 concrete block (high strength) to be tested and the 2 machines (Tinius Olsen) used by the lab for daily testing of high strength concrete cylinders could not deliver accurate results because the thickness of the platen (too flexible) was inadequate for the sample horizontal dimensions. - A new, thicker and stiffer platen had to be ordered before 28 day tests and all it took was a 10 second look at the test photos.

Personally, I do not like the cubes (1:1 h/t) because there is always some friction/restraint the force a 45 degree shear plane or confined compression failure. A cylinder usually has a 2:1 h/t ratio that provides results (30 degree or so) shear failure compatible with the concepts used in most code developments. The lab I dealt with was willing to take photos of the cylinder breaks upon request that could highlight erratic results or sample preparation.

Dick

Engineer and international traveler interested in construction techniques, problems and proper design.

RE: Concrete Cube Test vs. Cylinder Test

StructureMan....in the US, cylinders are the norm. In many other countries, cubes are the norm. I prefer cylinders, but there has been enough testing and research on cubes to consider them valid as well.

RE: Concrete Cube Test vs. Cylinder Test

General Rule in USA is Cylinders (6"x12" or 4"x8") for Concrete and Cubes (1"x1" or 2"x2") for Mortar/Grout with some labs doing Cylinders for Grout (3"x6").

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources