×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

80,000 Pound Dragster
3

80,000 Pound Dragster

80,000 Pound Dragster

(OP)
One day I was thinking about muscle cars and tractor pulls. What would you need to take a semi-tractor and turn it into a dragster? Obviously you would need a heck of a powerful engine of some kind to start with. Massaging the problem a little bit, I asked myself, "What would happen if you take an extended wheel base semi-tractor, mount a 50,000 pound flywheel cylinder and spin it up to 10,000 RPM and then pop the clutch to the drive wheels. What would happen if all that stored up energy were suddenly released?

It seemed reasonable that with enough gears, a stock semi-engine could be used to gradually bring the cylinder up to almost any speed desired. That it might be able to put a 1,000,000 potential HP into the cylinder. 1,000,000 HP / 80,000 pounds of vehicle weight would give you 125 HP to drive 1 pound of weight. I don't deal with these sort of classical physics computations on a regular basis, nor do I know that much about materials and mechanics. Would the whole thing just explode with basketball sized shrapnel flying all over the place, or could the semi-dragster be designed to handle it and shoot down down the drag strip? I don't know about you, but I'd pay good money to see a semi go from 0-200+ MPH within a quarter mile.

While this is an interesting problem, there are some serious applications I can see that could benefit from a sudden burst of energy, harnessed to do a brute-force type of event. The thing is, if you couldn't build an 80,000 lb dragster as a starting point, then these other applications probably wouldn't be feasible, either.

What do you think?

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

dwbarlow, I don't know the first thing about these subjects really, but I do know that in the recent past Formula 1 racecars used a flywheel system to store and recover energy.

Can be done. Devil's in the details :)

Regards,

Mike

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

1) What would happen is you'd break the weakest link in the drivetrain, fix it, then break something else. Rinse and repeat.
2) Hope you've got some good brakes.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

There are already jet powered drag race trucks - wind them up, hold on the brakes then let 'em go - sub 6 second 1/4 mile... - search the internet and you'll find videos of such things - just don't stand behind them at the track...

(There was a project some years ago to power a tram using a high inertia flywheel that would charge up at each stop to power it down the track in-between the stops, though I don't remember if it ever got finally built.)

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

OP said - "What would happen if all that stored up energy were suddenly released? "

probably something similar to 3:54 here -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VF0JwxQqcA
The tires lose traction and go up in smoke.

Applying the excess power gingerly but precisely "off the line" is required. Nowadays in top fuel and funny cars that ccontrol is not so much a driver function, but done by tuning tools like retarded timing and highly adjustable slipper clutches.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

(OP)
First off, this is not rocket propelled, and its not really engine powered.
Second, on a semi frame you could put at leas 4 tandom drive axels in place with 16 drive wheels, giving an awesome traction capability.
A triple clutch system could be deigned, one to get moving with lots of slip, once to start accelerating with some slip, and a final with no slip.
Each clutch could also be synced to the diesel engine (~600 HP) for the final 3 gears
Question, do they drag on concrete or asphalt?
Also, The original HP to Lb ratio is 12.5 HP/1 LB. Still pretty good I think.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Drag racing (like tractor pulling) is either a hobby or a business. If you start using big expensive equipment that you're going to tear up, you either need to have a huge audience paying for it, or you need some rich people owning it. So yes, we could drag-race locomotives if only we could get somebody to pay for it all.

In the case of a semi, it seems the problem is, that given you're going to race a semi, the fastest option is to race the lightest possible semi. So you'll see the jet-powered semis or schoolbusses or whatever, but they do use the lighter options there, too.

With a flywheel, with high-performance engines, or whatever, the problem is getting power to the pavement, not in generating the power, so it doesn't much matter if it's a windup car or nuclear powered, so there's not a lot of reason to fool around inventing something that might be better.

If you tried something like this in regular dragracing, either it'd work well, or it wouldn't, and if it worked well, they'd regulate it out of existence.

Somewhat related: One idea I had for a tractor pull is a large reciprocating weight on the tractor so that you get double the normal contact pressure with the ground at peak points of vibration, enabling higher traction for a small part of each tire rotation. It might actually work, it's just getting somebody to finance a pointless venture.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Regarding traction - the best you can do is drive all the wheels. It doesn't matter if there are 4 or 18 of them, the maximum acceleration is going to be mu x g.

je suis charlie

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

(OP)
I got out some old texts and did some calculations for this idea. I think they are correct but take a look and see if you agree with them

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

It seems like the power curve for this is going the opposite direction, i.e. as you remove energy from the flywheel it slows down, and it would take some finesse to have a transmission that increased the rotational velocity of the wheels as the rotational velocity of the flywheel decreased.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

As gruntguru noted, the max amount of power that can be effectively used at launch is limited by the traction capability of the drive tires. And it doesn't matter much how many are used. If we assume the static load radius (SLR) of the drive tires is around 21", the tires have a traction coefficient of 1.0, and the vehicle weighs 80,000 lbs, then the max torque that can be applied to all the drive tires before loss of traction is 140,000 ft-lbs. And this would not include the impulse torque spikes experienced by the drivetrain when you "...spin it up to 10,000 RPM and then pop the clutch to the drive wheels...". Designing a drivetrain capable of that amount of torque would be quite a challenge. Here's a white paper on a similar situation.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Putting all other discussions to one side, why the "traction coefficient of 1.0" limit? People often assume this.

Steve

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

"Putting all other discussions to one side, why the "traction coefficient of 1.0" limit?"

I blame my high school physics teacher Mr Prescott.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Put whatever traction coefficient is appropriate for the tires you intend to employ. However, remember that while the friction coefficient of a tire may be nonlinear, it tends upwards at lower specific loads. For a load this heavy, using conventional race tire materials, you may find that dragster references are not useful.

My first inclination about this question conjured images of the Saturn V rocket engines.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

(OP)
I broke down and did some calculations. I have attached the spread sheet (*.xls). You can check the math.

I found out if you take a single steel disk with a radius of 2 feet and a width of 1 foot, spin it up to 5,000 RPM you get a potential of about 35,450 HP

I also found out you need in excess of 32,000 HP to move 80,000 lbs a quarter mile in less then 6 seconds.

So, theoretically it is possible to create an 80,000 lb dragster that will do a quarter mile in under 6 seconds.

But with these kind of forces you have to be concerned about what kind of materials could take this kind of stress. So now it is a design problem. I was thinking if the flywheel was mounted on a tempered steel shaft 6 inches square, if that might take the stress.

I was also wondering if instead of U-Joints, each drive wheel is directly connected to the flywheel axel. There are no joints. Could it now take the stress? The drive wheels are off the ground as the flywheel is spun up. Popping the clutch in this case consists of slamming the drive wheels to the pavement simultaneously, or in some sort sequence. Instead of one big flywheel, and one set of drive wheels, 2, 3, or 4 drive shafts with integrated flywheels were utilized. Spinning up the flywheels would use conventional gears and joints powered by the truck engine. Some of drive shafts are identically geared for initial clutch pop. After the first one or two drive shafts are dropped, then the last one or two are geared higher (bigger tires).

As I said, this problem is a simple proof of concept for something more awesome (maybe).

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Your spinning disk has potential energy, how fast you remove the energy results in power. You could develop nearly infinite power if you removed the energy fast enough.

Are you considering all of the potential energy of the spinning disk, or just some percentage. It is going to very hard to get much useful energy out of the disk when it slows to nearly zero rpm.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

I think your required horsepower is less than 1/2 of what's actually required; I get something more like 87000 hp.

Your example disk weighs nearly 6000 lb, all by itself. When you add in the the structure required to hold and constrain that large a mass, you're probably adding 20000 lb to the vehicle. I think you'll find that the engine required to crank the flywheel up to speed in any sort of useful time will be gigantic. Getting 87000 hp is a nontrivial. As an FYI, the nuclear power plant for a Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine with 170-m length is rated for 60000 SHP.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
[IMG http://tinyurl.com/7ofakss]
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers


Of course I can. I can do anything. I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
There is a homework forum hosted by engineering.com: http://www.engineering.com/AskForum/aff/32.aspx

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

(OP)
I think a potential of twice the HP is needed. Peak HP is only used for 6 sec or so. After that event, any left over power would be allowed to dissipate, unless of course in a drag competition there were more heats.

Again, it is a mental experiment. It wouldn't take much more than $75,000 to make it real, but as others have said, unless there is an actual profit somewhere, either in dollars or recognition for a sponsor, I wouldn't invest in it just for the heck of it.

I am getting my payback by extending my knowledge about something I hadn't thought of before. My background is in aerospace and defense software. While this problem is interesting, I'm kind of thinking about a compact laser or magma canon. I'm also thinking about a first stage lift system for sending payloads into space using simple mechanics instead of expensive and unstable rocket fuel.

In the case of the canon, I look at what a lighting bolt is made out of, could a flywheel based generator, generate a controllable bolt of energy of the same magnitude. I think it could and it could be mounted on a heavy truck and be mobile. I know in the case of the canon that work has been done. I also am aware of some of the limitations currently being encountered with some of the existing systems being studied.

A first stage lift system that accelerates a payload to the upper atmosphere where rockets could take over would simplify current launch systems and reduce costs. If it were possible. You know of those twirlly thingies we played with as kids. You spin a shaft with a propeller on it and let it sail up. Could it be possible to borrow from that concept and make something useful out of it?

I still don't know much about lighting bolts, or lift capacity of propellers, but I know a little bit now about flywheels. I sincerely thank you all for your help.


RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

I ran your 80,000lb, 32,000hp, AWD drag truck concept in HP Wizard and got the result below. I used a tire traction coefficient of 1.0. It gave a 9.9sec 1/4 mile time at 179mph. This includes the effects of aero drag which I don't think your spreadsheet calculation did.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Your advantage of using a heavy dragstar is that "small" increases in weight are less restrictive, but they still add up. A 75 lb load added to a 150 lb sprinter is significant. 4x 150 lb loads added to a 15,000 lb truck is near-trivial - but can help if it is the right load.

Electric drive motors on each of the rear axles, on each side of the axle driving the wheel will add substantial instantaneous acceleration at low weight - IF you can get the capacitor weight low enough to produce the 10 seconds of power you will need for each start.

I say capacitor rather than battery or flywheel because the flywheel itself must be accelerated forward as well as slowed down as the energy is drained from it - and the flywheel will torque the truck sideways as it is jerked forward. (right-hand rule applies to acceleration in all three axis : the energy is being pulled out via the axle-and-generator being rotated, the axle-generator-and flywheel are being accelerated forward, and the truck will be jerked "upwards" in the classic wheelie lift of the front wheels.)

Battery isn't needed: Too short a electric need, and the chemical reaction just isn't fast enough. Capacitor-style energy discharge is fast and predictable. 4x Electric motors will give you a "quiet" drive - But is that a crowd pleaser and a attraction; or a crowd chaser?

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Has anybody seen a flywheel desintegrate? I have seen a small one used on a steam engine disintegrate and the damages to that engine room was spectacular as well as flinging the steam operator oiler about about 10' again the wall . I hate to see an 80,000 lbs flywheel disintegrate at 10,000 rpm as the driver can kiss his@#%$%^ goodbye, total wreckage of the drag race truck and perhaps casualties in the spectator stand..

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

tbuelna's results bear some consideration. That analysis uses 1g as the maximum acceleration, but to achieve 6 s 1/4 mile time requires 2.28g acceleration. This will require chewing up way more energy than would be required for a <1-g acceleration

The ending KE is 326 MJ, which, for a gasoline car would mean that about 7 kg of gas -->2.25 gal. So this would work out to a mileage of about 0.11 mpg

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
[IMG http://tinyurl.com/7ofakss]
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers


Of course I can. I can do anything. I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
There is a homework forum hosted by engineering.com: http://www.engineering.com/AskForum/aff/32.aspx

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

With friction coefficient = 1.0 "It gave a 9.9sec 1/4 mile time at 179mph. "

That is the math behind the claims by some in the 50s that no one would ever exceed 180 mph in the quarter mile.
http://www.printcentralandsigns.com/NHRA/records.h...

Until someone did it.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Yah, that's actually pretty amazing; the fastest 1/4 mile time results in about 6.4-g acceleration.

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
[IMG http://tinyurl.com/7ofakss]
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers


Of course I can. I can do anything. I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
There is a homework forum hosted by engineering.com: http://www.engineering.com/AskForum/aff/32.aspx

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

"With friction coefficient = 1.0 "It gave a 9.9sec 1/4 mile time at 179mph."..."

That was a tire traction coefficient = 1.0. The reason drag cars were able to achieve acceleration rates far beyond 1g was primarily due to help from aerodynamic downforce. A modern top fuel car probably produces over 15,000lbf of aero downforce at top speed, or around 6.5x the car's race weight.

If it matters, I re-ran the 80,000lb 32,000hp drag truck performance in HP Wizard using tire and aero lift/drag characteristics typical of a top fuel dragster and got the result shown below. You'll note that HP Wizard lists a default traction coefficient value of 4.0 for a drag race slick. But in reality I doubt this tire would be suitable for use with the 80,000lb truck described, as the typical top fuel dragster only weighs 2250lbs.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Right. That why I said above you should consider 8x racing "slicks" on the back of a truck - with all 8 being driven by 4x DC motors on the four axles. Let the front wheels go up - the back tires stay on their own platform with all wheel getting traction. DC motor will give instantaneous acceleration greater than that of a combustion engine, and the power comes not from a battery but a capacitor bank for quick (6 second) discharge.


Just ain't no noise.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Not just the noise, but the flames coming out of the exhaust ought to have something to do with it...

TTFN
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
[IMG http://tinyurl.com/7ofakss]
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers


Of course I can. I can do anything. I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
There is a homework forum hosted by engineering.com: http://www.engineering.com/AskForum/aff/32.aspx

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

(OP)
If it were built I would want to see AWESOME. Whistles on the flywheels that shriek at top RPM, un-muffled exhaust with bell shaped heads magnifying the sounds of the diesel, black smoke shooting in the air. And a young women in a bright pink fire suit stepping into the cab.

When I walked beside it while it was on display I'd want to feel SMALL beside that potential power. The tires fully 5 ft in diameter, 3 ft wide. At rest, the engine would purr, but having watched it in action once I would know this baby is a saber-toothed Tiger from legends.

Instead of flames, maybe a few huge static electricity burts centered on the vehicle, prior to the green light. When the parachutes are deployed at the end of a run, the sound of a huge cannon signaling the return to reality.

I'm sorry guys and gals, "IRstuff" got my mind's eye going and for a moment and I imagined it was real.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Google "Gyrobus".

It is better to have enough ideas for some of them to be wrong, than to be always right by having no ideas at all.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Google Sprint ABM.

It doesn't weigh quite 80k, but it does pull nearly 100Gs off the starting blocks and goes from there. I'm not impressed with any vehicle not heated to incandescence by high air speeds.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Wow, what a tough crowd! Haven't you guys ever stood right at the finish line of a drag strip when a top fuel car passed by at over 300mph? The heat, vibration and noise from the engine exhaust is like nothing you have ever experienced. Of course the max acceleration rate of a TF dragster is probably not more than around 6g, as opposed to a modern fighter jet or the Sprint missile.

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

Google "Jet Truck"

youtube

RE: 80,000 Pound Dragster

There's a crazy old science fiction story about a guy that fitted a really "big spring" into a school bus in order to outrun a sports car.

--

The most famous drag racing jet truck is called Shockwave.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources