×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Minimum Pile Spacing and Group Effect

Minimum Pile Spacing and Group Effect

Minimum Pile Spacing and Group Effect

(OP)
Generally, Pile Spacing is limited to a minimum of 3 X Diameter.
Question: I have a case where the Pile Spacing is less than 3 X Dia. (approx. 2-1/2 X Dia.), and the Group capacity exceeds the sum of the individual pile capacities, therefore, the individual pile capacity is used as the limit for each pile load.
In such a situation, is a reduction of the individual pile capacity required due to the spacing?

RE: Minimum Pile Spacing and Group Effect

You did not mention which pile group efficiency formula you are using, there are several. All of them give approximate answers at best. A popular one is the Converse-Labarre formula, shown below. It takes into account the pile spacing with the term Theta which is the arc tangent (in degrees) of diameter / spacing. For example, for a spacing of 3 diameters, Theta is 18.4 degrees. For spacing of 2.5 diameters, Theta is 21.8 degrees.



You will probably note that even for large pile spacing, say 10 pile diameters, the formula still shows group efficiency lower than 100%... that's one indication of the limitations of these calculations. Use them with that in mind.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: Minimum Pile Spacing and Group Effect

(OP)
SlideRuleEra - thank you for the response.
I simply calculated the Pile Group Capacity based on friction along the perimeter of the pile group block.
It seems the Converse-Labarre equation is more conservative (33% less Group Efficiency).

However, what I was trying to determine, is this:
The Pile Group Capacity exceeds the sum of the individual pile capacities.
Therefore, Individual Capacity governs and the capacity of the group = Sum of Individual Piles.

In this case, is any reduction factor (even if Group Efficiency > 1.0) required simply
because of the pile spacing?
If so, that would imply there is an upper bound pile capacity somewhere between the individual capacity and the (group capacity divided by no. of piles) as a function of pile spacing.

RE: Minimum Pile Spacing and Group Effect

Ok, I now understand how you are making the calcs. Everything that I've seen about the pile group capacity block failure is that it applies for a pile spacing of 2 to 3 pile diameters. This is another method that is based on limited field data. IMHO, there is no way to fine tune the calculation to give more accurate results. You will have to use judgment and perhaps make individual pile load test(s). Despite advances in pile driving monitoring, it remains as much art as it is science.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources