×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

(OP)
Hi Guys,

I have a customer asking us to roll AL6XN tubes into a SS316 tubesheet. I am obviously suggesting that they go with the AL6XN tubesheets as well, but I am not familiar enough with AL6XN to know if it is even possible to roll AL6XN tubes into a SS316 tubesheet. I know that some materials cannot be rolled into others (ex. SS316 tubes into brass tubesheet) because of differences in strength and elasticity but what is the criteria in making this decision?

Please advise,
Allan

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

The AL6XN tubes can be roll expanded into a 316 stainless steel tubesheet. By the way, 316 stainless steel tubes can be easily rolled into a Muntz metal or even brass tube sheet because the tube wall is relatively thin in comparison to the much thicker or stiffer tubesheet. The real concern in tube rolling is ensuring proper roll reduction and to minimize galvanic corrosion concerns between dissimilar materials.

You will need to develop a tube rolling procedure (measurements before and after rolling to ensure proper tube wall reduction) between the AL6XN and 316 stainless steel and provide a mock-up to validate the tube rolling procedure.

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

Afox88, some guidance can be found in Appendix A, see definition of fy. Per this, your expanded tube-ts joint would not require qualification by test (fy = 0.67).

The problem of course is that the tubesheet potentially yields more than the tubes and you don't get a good joint. Rolling a given tube can loosen previously rolled tubes.

This could be an adequate joint or not, depending on the service. I'd kind of consider it a marginal choice for a rolled-only joint.

A mockup would perhaps be in order.

Regards,

Mike

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

If this is for a condenser application, I see no concerns. If this is for a feedwater heater or other higher pressure heat exchanger component as mentioned by SnTMan , the requirements of ASME Section VIII, Div 1 would be required.

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

(OP)
Thank you for the feedback. We consider the requirement to do a mockup procedure to qualify a rolling procedure a no-go. Therefore, if a mock up procedure is required, we consider the materials as they are incompatible for rolling. (We obviously still do mockup for qualifying weld procedures)

Sntman, thanks for the info about Appendix A. At design temperature of 422F, the fy value is ~0.65 which is of course higher than 0.60. Therefore, we will advise our clients that it is acceptable to roll al6xn into ss316 but it is recommended to go al6xn also.

Thank You,

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

(OP)
Metengr, this is a low pressure exchanger. 300 psig 422F.

Thanks again.

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

Will these be seal welded?
Just asking because crevice corrosion of the 316 at the roll joint will be astronomical.

You really need a mock up and careful control of rolling torque, expansion alone is not a suitable control. With strong tubes and soft tubesheet there is no room for error (or re-rolling).

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

(OP)
Ed, the tube-ts joint will not be seal welded. The tubesheet is a solid SS316 tubesheet, no overlay or cladding. We previously offered them al6xn tubesheet and tubeside as well, but I guess it became to pricey for their budget so they want just the tubes. My stance is that they should at least go with AL6XN tubesheet as well but this is a customer that hasn't heeded my advice before.

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

Afox88
Considering the design conditions (if this were a condenser application it would not matter), I would use a mock-up to demonstrate the effectivness of a rolled tube joint using the stated materials. If anything you can consider grooves in the tubesheet holes accepting the tubes to enhance leak tightness.

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

(OP)
Metengr, we will definetly double groove our tubesheet holes. That is a certainty as it is our standard.

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

Don't double groove, instead use more, and smaller grooves. You won't be able to force the 6XN into the larger grooves because the 316 is too soft.
There is data reported on dissimilar metal crevice corrosion.
At the joint the 316L tubesheet will see faster attack than if there were 316L tubes in it.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube

RE: Rolling AL6XN Tubes into SS316 tubesheet

All great answers above. Just my thoughts to add to the conversation would be check the difference in thermal expansion on the tubes and the shell of the exchanger.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources