Eficient Design?????
Eficient Design?????
(OP)
Hi every one!
I am Mechanical Designer, I design machines and fixtures. In my work we have a lot of problems with the time of the design. Some times our clients ask for machines or fixtures in a very short time, and that make that the work we do has a lots of re-works.
I like to know your experiences in the proces of design. If you have standar materials, standar bolts, etc.?
I like to know about your organization.
Sorry about my englis. I hope that you can help whit your experience. Thank.
I am Mechanical Designer, I design machines and fixtures. In my work we have a lot of problems with the time of the design. Some times our clients ask for machines or fixtures in a very short time, and that make that the work we do has a lots of re-works.
I like to know your experiences in the proces of design. If you have standar materials, standar bolts, etc.?
I like to know about your organization.
Sorry about my englis. I hope that you can help whit your experience. Thank.





RE: Eficient Design?????
Well, we do much what you do, "inventors for hire". In my experience, we have been very happy to have recently a second order for some of our designs, but most times it is a one time solution, with possible application of some subsystems of it in the future. It is not that our inventions do not work, sometimes they take a little longer, but so far we have completed more than 1000, between small pieces and complete systems. What do we do is to talk a lot with the client to see what he "really" needs (and not only what he "wants"), then we do a hand draft, if complicated we make a rapid draft by cad. Then we quote. If accepted we work details, present again the design to the client, and finally we build the solution.
This is the theoric process. Actually steps are much fuzzier, and some clients push for faster approaches with a sacrifice in efficiency. But they are the bosses...
hth sancat
RE: Eficient Design?????
1. Time
2. Quality
3. Cost
You can only pick two of the above, and your choice will effect the third factor.
If you want something quick, it's going to drive cost up and lower quality.
If you want something high quality, it's going to drive cost up and take a long time.
If you want something cheap, the quality will suffer, but will be quick.
I'm sure there are other various you can figure out.
"The attempt and not the deed confounds us."
RE: Eficient Design?????
FAST, CHEAP, GOOD
Pick two!
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Eficient Design?????
fast, cheap, good
pick two and be happy if you get one!
RE: Eficient Design?????
That made me laugh.
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Eficient Design?????
What about the the way you are organizated?
There are diferents theories to control the quality of one product (for example six sigma), and I like to know if some similar can be aplyed to the process of design?
RE: Eficient Design?????
This is from the 'Murphy's Law' website.I think there is a lot of truth in this.
Speedy
"Tell a man there are 300 billion stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure."
RE: Eficient Design?????
RE: Eficient Design?????
a.
RE: Eficient Design?????
Viktor
http://viktorastakhov.tripod.com
RE: Eficient Design?????
I guess the reliability/robustness concepts would be useful in the design phase, although anyone who is designing complex systems outside of six sigma without at least an intuitive grasp of the robustness ideas will be struggling already.
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Eficient Design?????
I am a dummy – explain me please the difference between six sigma and total quality.
Viktor
http://viktorastakhov.tripod.com
RE: Eficient Design?????
I don't know enough about TQ to comment. I do know you aren't a dummy!
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Eficient Design?????
IMHO design is closer to an artist work, and that is hardly evaluable through a quality control scheme. An exception would be the case of designing things that are very similar, in that case you would be able to analyze the process, but I am not sure if that kind of design is common.
sancat
RE: Eficient Design?????
I have another “simple” question (dummy is dummy, forgive my ignorance). Ford is an active promoter of six sigma. Moreover, they have the greatest numbers of black belts (“per capita”). I am wondering naively if it helped improving the quantity and reliability of their cars? What is the efficiency of implementing this program defined as the amount of money invested /quality improvement?
Viktor
http://viktorastakhov.tripod.com
RE: Eficient Design?????
Probably the biggest bottom line contributor at the moment is warranty reduction. Traditionally warranty reduction has been part of a design engineer's job, but he is usually too stressed getting the next model out to worry overmuch about the current, or past, cars. Having a group of reasonably motivated people dedicated to solving problems has made a big difference.
The reason that it works is not the methodology, although that is slightly better than what we had before. The big plus is that the entire organisation, from top to bottom, has decided to use it, or at least won't stand in its way. If a project has a demonstrable positive return then it will probably get funded (they rank them somehow, but I haven't heard of a sensible project getting turned down yet).
Mind you, it isn't roses all the way, sucking many of our more talented/ambitious engineers out of the main programs into six sigma for a couple of years must have an impact on the quality of the design job. Hopefully that is a just a short term hit and the long term benefits will more than compensate.
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Eficient Design?????
As I understand, there is a device that has some level of problems, and goes to the design office to be re-designed, and improved in some lines. That is ok.
But is that to apply TQ or 6S to the process of design?,
Is the <<design process>> in itself quality controlled?
Or the process of design is a solution to the failure of the device to try to lower warranty reclaims?
sancat
RE: Eficient Design?????
No, I don't think it is
"Is the <<design process>> in itself quality controlled?"
Let's see.
The design process is measured objectively (both in the performance of prototypes and models, and in the rate of progress of each individual part through the design process). If the objectives aren't met then changes are put in place. I think that is quality control of a sort. It certainly isn't statistical quality control as I understand it.
I don't understand "Or the process of design is a solution to the failure of the device to try to lower warranty reclaims?" - can you have another go?
By the way I was NOT claiming that I've seen Six Sigma commonly being used at the design stage, I was wondering if other people had.
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Eficient Design?????
I did not understand myself too! (English is hard, you don’t use a specific word order, and it is non intelligible)
I was trying to say that design was being used to improve a device following the feedback from the field. Right?
I agree that it would be extremely difficult to measure whether design was produced using a TQ scheme.
sancat
RE: Eficient Design?????
That's pretty much the order of priority as well. the truth is that with the headcount reductions we've seen only top priority stuff gets worked on, the rest is ignored.
Yes, we do redesign parts as a result of field experience, but in the past a field problem would have to be pretty expensive to get much attention. All these 6S guys running around looking for easy projects have been snapping these up, which makes sense to me, we should have done it years ago.
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Eficient Design?????
The Japanese long ago discovered the value of mature, engineering-driven business where most of the money is put up front where it really counts: in the product development phase. Result: lower overall costs and higher product quality. The key word is maturity; Japanese business decision aren't as heavily influenced by stockholders who expect "instant gratification" and rosey quarterly statements. The Japanese stakeholders (stockholders and executives ) are more mature in their business planning and expectations. Stockholders there expect ten and even twenty year plans and understand that quality products require time, planning, and heavy investment in engineering and R&D. Most US businesses are lucky to have even a five year plan!
Don't get me wrong, though. All things considered, I'd rather stay in the US than move to Japan! I would just like to see more maturity on the part of US stakeholders and see business executives learn from their mistakes, swallow their pride, have more patience with product development, and perhaps learn from other more successful manufacturers.
The old adage has applied EVERYWHERE I've worked: "There's never enough time to do it right the first time but there's always enough time to do it a second time."