×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Caged Ladder Design

Caged Ladder Design

Caged Ladder Design

(OP)
Hey all, I've got a question about how ladders in an industrial setting are typically analyzed. In verifying a proposed stationary 16' ladder that uses 2-1/2"x3/8" flat bar for the stringers and 3/4" pipe for the rungs, I'm not entirely sure how these are generally modeled. My first instinct is to treat the Lx as the full length of the ladder, the Ly as the distance between treads, and the tread-to-stringer connection as fixed (in verifying the stringers) and pinned (in verifying the treads). Also, I'm not entirely sure about how to account for the proposed connection, in which the stringer has a hole drilled through it, through which the rung partially penetrates and is all-round welded on the inside of the hole. Is there a generally accepted procedure for modeling those perforations?

RE: Caged Ladder Design

For the most part you don't redesign these. Look at your local OHS requirements and they normally either have a required detail or refer to a standard that includes details and/or a design basis. Your client may also have their own standards.

ANSI-A14 is pretty commonly accepted. PIP has a good standard ladder too.

This is very much a 'don't reinvent the wheel' scenario.

RE: Caged Ladder Design

Similar issues have come up with guard rails in some recent posts.

There are in fact some standards that give minimum member size, spacing, etc, and also minimum design load, and it can be difficult to make the two jive.

Wherever you get your design loads from, note if they are allowable loads or "must not fail under this load" or what. It may require using plastic moment, etc., to match the minimum member sizes to the design loads.

Check if rungs need to be non-skid or not. If so, possibly use weldable rebar. If you're using "pipe", check if structural tubing of the desired size is available- it may have a higher yield point that helps on the design.

RE: Caged Ladder Design

US OSHA just straight up copied the requirements from the ANSI ladder. If that's your jurisdiction, you should cross check once because a couple of dimensional requirements apparently changed in ANSI after they copied them over, so they aren't quite the same anymore. I believe loads are all the same still. So the intent is in the ANSI standard. It has both design loads *and* sizes of members that meet those loads. If you really want to back check to figure out what kinds of loads they are, you could do that, but I'd just go ahead and use the required sizes.

Making something on your own is significantly more likely to cause you problems than following a standard that's safely and successfully been in use for decades.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources