×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
Apart from companies'/owners' standards, is their any technical reason (valve cracking, mechanical integrity ..... etc.) or any obligatory code or standard that prohibits the use of control valve rating 150# for raised face flanged control valves (Globe Style) smaller than 2 inches in oil and gas applications?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

Steve010,

If you're going to double post - http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=386167 at least reference the previous one in your post.

did you not like the answers you got in that post?

Codes and standards are not normally in the business of prohibiting one size of something that is allowed in a different size.

AFAK there is no technical or code reason behind this, simply economics and practicality

Remember - More details = better answers
Also: If you get a response it's polite to respond to it.

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
Sorry, I was thinking to ask the piping/mechanical engineers as well.
what do you mean by practicality ? I found that most vendors manufacture them (so it seams that nothing inhibits their use).
I am concerned if there may be any mechanical concern on control valves (globe valves) with small sizes, like cracking or mechanical integrity ... etc. in fuel gas applications.

The valve is already present with a flange and body rating 150# (size 1 inch) but i am thinking to bring another one (with 300#) because of the sentence i find in most owner companies' specifications " control valves with sizes below 2" should have a minimum rating of 300#"

Have you ever used one?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

Generally I do not use anything (pipe included) less than 2", unless there is a very good reason only a smaller size will work. Vibrations, unaccounted for loadings, accidental impacts, deflection control between supports ... all must be considered. I have worked with numerous company standards that recommend the same, and in addition require XXS wall for any use of 2" pipe. Using less is generally considered false economy in industrial scale operations. If you have a small domestic water system, that's another thing.

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
No, it is not domestic water system. It is an oil and gas plant (fuel gas blanketing service). The piping is 1". Should i use a 2" valve on a 1" pipe?
I have seen that most companies standards alow the use of control valves' with sizes not smaller than 1".

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

Low stress situation, not main piping, not blowdown, well protected pipe, little possibility of excess or unknown loads, no vibration, sure, why not. I don't think I would think of using #300.

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
You mean it is ok to use a 1" valve with flange and body rating 150#?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

If you have a good reason to use it, no reason not to, and you don't need more pressure rating than #150. Yes.

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
Why did API Recommended Practice 553 (Refinery Control Valves) state that valves for vapor depressurizing should be minimum 2" rating 300# for mechanical integrity?
isn't the rating determined solely by the design pressure and temperature ?
What is the relation between size and rating and such service ?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

Vibration, high forces from slugging, or cooling from vapor expansion could be a concern. Design temperature is only a guide from the process engineers. Did they say no slugging, or vibration? Is the relief stack exposed to high winds, seismic loads?

While RPs are fine as general guides, I do not think following their recommendations are mandatory in all circumstances.

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
I am not a mechanical engineer. But isn't vibration an issue that is solved by good pipe supporting and not by size and increasing rating? Isn't rating only a measure of the pressure/ temperature the valve and pipes can withstand?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

Not totally. Larger size and wall thickness usually decreases vibration frequency and amplitude, for example.

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
Biginch. Thank you very much that's a very good point that never crossed my mind. Yes frequency of vibrations depends on dimensions.
I know how to calculate the cooling effect from depress. Using the jt effect. But how can i decide whether vibrations are going to happen or not ?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
Also the piping project spec states that globe valves for sizes from 2" to 4" flanged RF with rating 150# for that class. And that globe valves from 1/2" to 2" are socket weld rating 800#. Does that makes the 1" control valve with flanged RF end connections rating 150#, deviate from the piping spec? It seams that piping manual valves vendors manufacture such small sizes with SW 800# as standard. Any concerns?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

Steve010,

Although the Piping Spec stipulates globe valves at Class 150 & Class 800 these are manual valves and control valves are usually by Instrument Group and if Class 300 selected Piping will provide Class 300 flanges to mate. There have been previous posts on this topic of minimum Class 300 control valves and the general consensus I believe is that there is no technical reason just manufacturers preference.

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
Something came across my mind. The valve body thickness does not take into account corrosion allowance. for example when piping specifies a corrosion allowance of 2 mm for the pipes this corrosion allowance is not taken into account by the valve manufacturer.
For Small valve sizes, the body wall thickness is small unlike larger valve sizes. For example as per ASME B16.34 the minimum body wall thickness for 1" valve with rating 150# is 3.9 mm.
Maybe the minimum rating of 300# is specified for small valve sizes is to cover this issue. Any idea ?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

For valves you would normally use a corrosion resistant trim. For small lengths inside a valve use of exotic materials is cost effective. Corrosion allowances mess up the mfgrs machining dimension tables.

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
Yes, the trim is corrosion resistant 316 SS, but the body is carbon steel, so it will loose thickness by time, just like the pipes. Piping include corrosion allowance of 2 mm for the pipes, how is that taken into account for the valve? especially that small valves with rating 150# has a very small body wall thickness. For example as per ASME B16.34 the minimum body wall thickness for 1" valve with rating 150# is 3.9 mm. Does this has anything to do with specifying the small valve sizes with minimum rating 300#?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
After the corrosion allowance and according to the piping spec. the 1" pipe schedule is sch.160 which means that the pipe wall thickness is 6.35 mm. According to ASME B16.34 the minimum body wall thickness for 1" valve with rating 150# is 3.9 mm.
This means that the pipe wall thickness is greater than the valve body thickness ???

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

Steve010,

The pipe schedule in small bore piping is normally specified for mechanical protection and coversely above the calculated thickness as per your example in Class 150. You would also specify the corrosion allowance in your valve data sheet/description and if this in the unlikely event then exceeded the minimum thickness as per ASME B16.34 the manufacturer would have to add additional thickness. The minimum Class 300 control valve is irrelevant in this context and a quick search on google will give plenty examples of Class 150 control valves.

http://www.flowserve.com/files/www/Literature/Prod...

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
Vendors do not include corrosion allowances in their manufacturing process. They manufacture valves with fixed thicknesses. Due to their standard machining processes, what i know is that they will never add more thickness. I asked masoneilan and they confirmed that valve thickness is standard according to the valve size and rating.
Does this mean that corrosion allowance may require increasing the rating? Especially in small valve sizes due to low valve thickness?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

No. Ask for the appropriate trim to resist corrosion.

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

(OP)
The trim is 316 ss so it will resist corrosion, but the body is cs like the pipe. Trim does not require corrosion allowance but valve body may require. Loosing thickness from the body by time will derate the valve. What is your opinion?

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

You won't be able to get extra wall on a valve.
Chances are that it will be thicker than the pipe. Check the dimensions.

If the body corrodes, I'd just replace it.

RE: Control Valve Minimum Pressure Rating

I would also refrian from using less than 2" piping, mainly because of a concern wrt operators stepping on the pipig, and less than 2" dosnt have sufficient strength - and the savings from going down in size is insignificant?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources