×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Strut and Tie

Strut and Tie

Strut and Tie

(OP)
I have an easy question. In a strut and tie design does the maximum shear limit of ACI 318 11.7 still apply?

RE: Strut and Tie

Yes, all the provisions in 11.7 are applied to members classified as deep beams. The commentary says the limit was based on a re-examination of test data that showed beams failed primarily due to crushing of the support regions.

RE: Strut and Tie

I vote no. Shear and concrete crushing are explicitly checked using strut and node checks in the strut and tie design procedures.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Strut and Tie

Yes. 11.7 applies to deep beams and deep beams are analyzed using strut and tie. The upper limit on shear strength specified in 11.7 is just that - the upper limit. The strut strength, node strengths, etc. still have to be checked per Appendix "A". The upper limit in 11.7 is pretty high. If you need more strength than that, then that is an indication that your beam is too small.

RE: Strut and Tie

That's a good point, Koot. I wonder if this falls into the realm of shear limits that no one really understands and the researchers are no longer around to ask them to clarify.

RE: Strut and Tie

PCA Notes does perform the maximum shear check in their strut and tie design example.

RE: Strut and Tie

I agree with Cliff, in that if you are exceeding that limit your beam is just too damn small. I love a nice strut and tie now and again, but those max limits are there in part to smack you in the face and say you need something bigger.

RE: Strut and Tie

More thoughts:

- I agree that a literal read of 11.7 would lead one to apply 11.7.3.

- I agree that 11.7.3 seems like a reasonable upper limit and I would be surprised to see it govern in any properly STM designed members.

- my suspicion is that 11.7.3 exists for the benefit of deep beam design procedures other than STM.

- 11.7.2 language kind of implies that 11.7.3 could be skipped for STM designed members.

- 11.7.3 commentary contends that we're guarding against diagonal compression failure. But then the form of the equation suggests that we're checking concrete tensile stresses. Does concrete tensile stress have a major role to play in STM designed members? Maybe it is getting at cross strut tensile splitting stresses? But then I thought that the whole idea was to allow diagonal tension cracking and keep the crack width reasonable using side face reinforcement?

In answer to OP's original question, I guess that I'd put it in functional terms:

1) in a new, minimally constrained design, would I ensure that 11.7.3 was satisfied? You bet.

2) If sasisfying 11.7.3 required a post-tender adjustment or potentially agravating a client, would I let it slide? Probably.





I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources