×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Disjointed Diaphragm Aspect Ratio

Disjointed Diaphragm Aspect Ratio

Disjointed Diaphragm Aspect Ratio

(OP)
I have a building with a plan area of 140ft x 58ft. This gives an overall aspect ration of 2.4, not a problem. However, when looking at the section of this building the roof is divided (see attached). There is a clear story in the center. If i look at the aspect ratio for each half I get a ratio of 4.8, problem.

I do not know if i can count on this complete 58ft roof to act as a single acceptable diaphragm, or do i need to count for it as two separate ones? The short vertical clear story will be sheathed in wood it does have many openings but i can utilize decent panels between windows for shear transfer as required.

I am wondering what your opinions are on the acceptable vs run-away nature of this building and what are some serious concerns you may have with the lateral loading in the 140ft length.

As per AWC 2008 Table 4.2.4
Max Diaphragm Aspect Ratios for Slope Diaphragms
Blocked Wood Structural panels = 4:1
Unblocked Wood Structural panels = 3:1

Roof System
I-joist rafters, no ceiling joists
Low eave=9ft, Top of 5' clear story=22ft, highest eave=30ft
The center wall will be full height 2x6 studs and i probably will be sheathing it in wood for the in-plane loading.

I will be checking deflection... just haven't yet

RE: Disjointed Diaphragm Aspect Ratio

I think you have two distinct diaphragms unless there's some means to transfer out of plane forces through the clear story.

RE: Disjointed Diaphragm Aspect Ratio

This is a nasty condition for wood. Are there any interior shear walls? You've definitely got two separate diaphragms there. You can either bring the force from each one to your shear walls below or you can drag the force from one into the other using a transfer diaphragm. I'd try to put a shear wall directly below the discontinuity and also some on the exterior. It'd probably be pretty easy to drag the force in that way, depending on the configuration.

If your worried about aspect ratios, then just add an interior shear wall for the other direction. Since your probably using a flexible diaphragm, the area between each shear wall is treated as a separate diaphragm. Either way, there is some detailing required to make sure the forces are going to the right places.

RE: Disjointed Diaphragm Aspect Ratio

(OP)
No interior walls of any sort. Only movable partitions. Looks like a case for moment frames!

Thanks for the verification. time to go hurt the architect's feelings :)

RE: Disjointed Diaphragm Aspect Ratio

You could sell me on the single diaphragm concept so long as you're careful about the vertical force transfer at both the clerestory and the chord elements at the end walls. My gut feel is that this system will attempt to behave as a single diaphragm no matter what you do.

I'd feel better about it all if the clerestory could be a steel truss with vierendeel panels. That would get expensive of course.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Disjointed Diaphragm Aspect Ratio

(OP)
I agree it would take some rather detailed analysis on the chords. I found a transverse wall in the higher roof section which i may be able to dump load into through a collector. The clear story has a cased opening in the middle of a long hall that i will have to convince the Arch to relocate 3ft. This in theory should reduce the aspect ratio in half. Just some serious detailing and the use of LVL instead of the I-joist in that location. Or go with steel.

Thanks!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources