INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Specifying two balance grades for the same part

Specifying two balance grades for the same part

(OP)
I have a component that is machine balanced and then mounted on an overhung shaft. To leave room for straightness error of the overhung shaft, we balance to a single-plane imbalance that's very good (<G2.5), but because of the conical shape a true two-plane imbalance is not achievable to this level. As it's a cast part, I am uncomfortable with ignoring the two-plane imbalance quality, so I want to specify a rough control over the couple unbalance component.

I can think of two ways to handle this, and I'd like to confirm if they are technically correct and likely to be understood:
1) Specify single plane unbalance limit (oz-in, <G2.5). Declare two balance planes locations and specify another unbalance limit (oz-in, G16?) on each of those two planes.
2) Specify single plane unbalance limit (oz-in, <G2.5). Specify limit of couple unbalance component (oz-in^2).

The second method is simpler but I'm not sure it's technically sound or well understood by balancing vendors. What's the best engineering practice?

RE: Specifying two balance grades for the same part

if you can send drawing from your part, It might be helpful to talk about your problem.

the permissible residual unbalance must be calculated according to ISO 1940-1. this value is calculated for center of gravity and if you want to have a dynamic two plane balance, you must recalculate the permissible values in each plane individually using translation methods.
but if the CG is located between balancing planes, you can divide the permissible unbalance values by 2.

but! the balancing quality Grade is defined a value for whole rotating component. you can not talk about balancing grade for each plane. you can only say that if you want to have for example the G1 balancing grade, the minimum permissible unbalance value on each plane must be less than something specified.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close