×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sliding of Foundation

Sliding of Foundation

Sliding of Foundation

(OP)
I am checking foundation for sliding. I have the base shear form the structure above.

Now my question do i have to consider lateral force due to foundation weight itself to add to the demand sliding force.

If that is case, I have hard time qualifying foundation for the sliding. Any thoughts

RE: Sliding of Foundation

What lateral force is due to the foundation weight? If you mean lateral earth pressure due to unbalanced soil loads on each side of a grade beam or something similar, yes those should be considered.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

I vote yes. The footing's acceleration will match that of the ground and inertial forces will develop as a result. In my mind this is similar to how seismic earth pressures develop behind retaining walls.

I've wondered about the need for a sliding check under seismic loads. If sliding actually occurred, that would theoretically limit the development of subsequent seismic forces, somewhat like a plastic hinge in a shear wall. On the other hand, if there will be large ground movements, I guess you wouldn't want your building sliding into your neighbour's building.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

(OP)
@canwesteng

no not the lateral earth pressure, the inertial forces of the foundation itself

RE: Sliding of Foundation

What internal forces of a foundation? do you mean something like Cs*Weight? Or is it a retaining wall system?

RE: Sliding of Foundation

I get it, inertial forces from ground acceleration. I would think yes, think of the ground accelerating the structure in one direction, then acceleration switches to the other direction. In that case I think the foundation mass contributes to the sliding. Is it only the mass of the foundation causing problems, or are you including the mass of soil on the footing as well?

RE: Sliding of Foundation

"On the other hand, if there will be large ground movements, I guess you wouldn't want your building sliding into your neighbour's building."

It is possible to run into situations where the design vertical acceleration is greater than 1g, which to me implies that the structure (and the earth below it) is being lobbed into the air. And I think it was pointed out along the way, that those accelerations tend to be at higher frequencies and involve small amplitudes. So your structure may be lobbed into the air, but it's lobbed a millimeter high, not 20' high. I suspect this would apply to the sliding issue as well.

Last year, I was at one of the ASCE seminars on seismic design of equipment and other non-building structures. One of the things discussed there was that it was possible to use time-history analysis from some past earthquakes and calculate estimated movement for something like this numerically. Obviously, there's a lot of room for variation in those kinds of results, but it serves to show whether the sliding involved would be a fraction of an inch or several feet or what.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

Come to think of it, is it not possible to have spectral acceleration and a friction coefficient such that resisting sliding is impossible?

RE: Sliding of Foundation

(OP)
ok after reading lot of reports from FEMA and talking to seniors. I realized that there is no specific criteria prescribed by coded. According to some seniors, ASCE was planning to come up with clear procedure. FEMA talks a lot about sliding due to flooding but not clear about seismic forces

For my case, I did consider inertial forces as I thought its more correct. I changed to configuration of foundation, made it look like channel (rotated 90 degrees with flanges down) with two keys at the bottom. It was cumbersome to do all the calcs, but I was able to make it work.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

It's been a while since I've done a seismic design, but if my recollection is correct, it seems like I decided there likely would be at least a reduced seismic sliding force due to the foundation weight, but that ASCE 7-05 didn't seem to mandate that it be included.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

KootK has a good point there. If sliding did actually occur during seismic condition, wont you have like a slide bearing support on a building wherein it massively reduces the seismic forces experienced by the structure?

My opinion is no, dont consider it. Just use the seismic weight on everything above the grade line.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

Let's undertake a mental experiment. Start with a greenfield site next to the San Andreas. Next, place a large precast block on the ground and apply a seismic event. Will the precast block exert a seismic shear on the supporting soil? You bet it will.

Now, how is a building foundation different in a way that would eliminate the seismic shear?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

(OP)
Kootk. Very true.

It tough to Ignore this. I have seen many existing designs where they ignored it. I can't convince myself to do that.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

Placing the precast rock on the ground and burying it are two different things. I haven't seen a footing design wherein the weight of a footing is added to the seismic weight for stability checks on a foundation.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

(OP)
Let me discuss more this week with people. This looks like a grey area. I will let u guys know

RE: Sliding of Foundation

Quote (mathcadboy)

Placing the precast rock on the ground and burying it are two different things.

If you understand why they are two different things with respect to seismic inertial loads, please elaborate.

Thanks for starting this thread Surya. And please do report back when you reach a consensus with your colleagues. I've never included foundation self weight as seismic weight and know of no instance of anyone else doing so either. You've really given me something to think about with this.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

Yes I do believe lots of engineers have different opinions regarding this. I think it will boil down to how conservative you want to be. If it would make you sleep well at night and cost is not that of an issue, then just include it.

But I do still want to see the designs that you mentioned. Is it from a reliable engineering reference or just calculations made by colleagues?

RE: Sliding of Foundation

(OP)
KootK,

I am happy that all u guys spent time on this. I will let you all know.

Mathcadboy
The rationale I heard differed from each engineer to other. Some said it's too conservative.

One of the better reason from a senior was, post seismic tests indicated not much sliding on foundations, but he said the codes are silent on this and left it to engineers. having said that he added he would consider that force Risk cat IV structures just to cover his neck

RE: Sliding of Foundation

I guess the next question would be, if the foundation is to be considered a source of seismic weight, what should be the seismic load generated? I would argue that:

1) It should be calculated separately from the superstructure.
2) It should be based on the elastic response spectrum (R=1).
3) It should be based on a period of zero.

Because the seismic response spectrum drops off so sharply to the left of the constant acceleration transition period, this may lead to fairly minor seismic forces. Consider two possibilities:

1) short building with short period. The acceleration of the footing would be much less than the superstructure and forces wouldn't add up to much.

2) tall building with long period. Accelerations might be comparable but foundation weight would get lost in the noise of all the contributing seismic weight of the many floors above.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

If you assume an elastic subgrade (or some variation thereof), you wouldn't be limited to zero period for a foundation.
For overturning moment, the foundation weight won't have a lot of effect due to being down low, the original question related to shear, where it would be more critical.
I believe all the seismic loading is tabulated for surface level, so at some depth down, you ought to get a little lower loading, also.
The seismic design forces aren't just derived from fundamental principles, they're all codified by committees, etc., so if you get into a situation not covered by the codes, you don't necessarily have a "right" way to do it, either.
If you consider what's happening in the foundation, you can also consider soil-structure interaction, which can lower the design loads.
In a few minutes googling around and looking through the bookshelf, I couldn't find anything really relating to the topic one way or the other.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

Did run across this quote:
"As part of normal practice, all of the foundation weight and half of the first-story wall weight are commonly omitted in the analysis of seismic diaphragm loads (See Sec. 6.34). However, such a provision is not explicitly defined in the IBC for calculating base shear, nor is such a provision mentioned in the Blue Book commentary." Footnote, Page 6-24, "Seismic Design of Building Structures", 10th Edition, by Lindeburg and McMullin, parts of which are on Google.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

(OP)
JStephen

Thank you for ur input. I have that lindberg book, but I wanted similar statement from IBC or CBC (both are silent).

Also that may be ok for a multi story building as the foundation weight is relatively small. If I am designing a foundation for equipment (large), then i cannot agree with that ideology.

I dont this will have any impact on soil-struction interaction as this foundation will be like a needle in haystack.

this looks like a interesting topic, whom ever i asked in person, first reaction is "hmmmmm"

RE: Sliding of Foundation

I think considering self weight of the foundation is too conservative if you do not include soil-structure interaction. If you do consider these effects, then I think it is reasonable to use the self weight. Also, what type of analysis was used? I would say this flies in the face of the Simplified and Equivalent Lateral Force Procedures without soil-structure interaction and I would not consider it for these. Those procedures are inherently conservative with their base shears (assumes fixed base, how can this assumption be violated?). Now if you were using a Response Spectra analysis? Yea, I would include it, but I would also include soil-structure interaction. Either way, considering the soil-structure interaction is going to reduce the base shear.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

(OP)
@mike20793

I am not violating the Fixed base assumption. that fixed base assumption is between superstructure and foundation, not between foundation and soil.

The only reason, to neglect the wt of foundation in multi-story bldg is, its a negligible wt compared to total super structure wt, not any other complex phenomenon.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

How is a support that translates in a seismic event fixed? If your saying your foundation will have an inertial force then this is a sliding bearing type condition mathcadboy mentioned above and it is not truly "fixed" but rather acts like a spring hence the reduction in base shear. Yes, including it violates the fixed base assumption without including soil-structure interaction, which reduces base shear. Including soil-structure interaction would not violate it because the Equivalent Lateral Procedure in ASCE 7 Chapter 19 takes the effects of soil springs into account.

RE: Sliding of Foundation

Surya,

Sorry, I see your point now. I was misunderstanding what you were trying to say until I created a paper model and it "clicked."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources