Sliding of Foundation
Sliding of Foundation
(OP)
I am checking foundation for sliding. I have the base shear form the structure above.
Now my question do i have to consider lateral force due to foundation weight itself to add to the demand sliding force.
If that is case, I have hard time qualifying foundation for the sliding. Any thoughts
Now my question do i have to consider lateral force due to foundation weight itself to add to the demand sliding force.
If that is case, I have hard time qualifying foundation for the sliding. Any thoughts






RE: Sliding of Foundation
RE: Sliding of Foundation
I've wondered about the need for a sliding check under seismic loads. If sliding actually occurred, that would theoretically limit the development of subsequent seismic forces, somewhat like a plastic hinge in a shear wall. On the other hand, if there will be large ground movements, I guess you wouldn't want your building sliding into your neighbour's building.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
no not the lateral earth pressure, the inertial forces of the foundation itself
RE: Sliding of Foundation
RE: Sliding of Foundation
RE: Sliding of Foundation
It is possible to run into situations where the design vertical acceleration is greater than 1g, which to me implies that the structure (and the earth below it) is being lobbed into the air. And I think it was pointed out along the way, that those accelerations tend to be at higher frequencies and involve small amplitudes. So your structure may be lobbed into the air, but it's lobbed a millimeter high, not 20' high. I suspect this would apply to the sliding issue as well.
Last year, I was at one of the ASCE seminars on seismic design of equipment and other non-building structures. One of the things discussed there was that it was possible to use time-history analysis from some past earthquakes and calculate estimated movement for something like this numerically. Obviously, there's a lot of room for variation in those kinds of results, but it serves to show whether the sliding involved would be a fraction of an inch or several feet or what.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
RE: Sliding of Foundation
For my case, I did consider inertial forces as I thought its more correct. I changed to configuration of foundation, made it look like channel (rotated 90 degrees with flanges down) with two keys at the bottom. It was cumbersome to do all the calcs, but I was able to make it work.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
RE: Sliding of Foundation
My opinion is no, dont consider it. Just use the seismic weight on everything above the grade line.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
Now, how is a building foundation different in a way that would eliminate the seismic shear?
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
It tough to Ignore this. I have seen many existing designs where they ignored it. I can't convince myself to do that.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
RE: Sliding of Foundation
RE: Sliding of Foundation
If you understand why they are two different things with respect to seismic inertial loads, please elaborate.
Thanks for starting this thread Surya. And please do report back when you reach a consensus with your colleagues. I've never included foundation self weight as seismic weight and know of no instance of anyone else doing so either. You've really given me something to think about with this.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
But I do still want to see the designs that you mentioned. Is it from a reliable engineering reference or just calculations made by colleagues?
RE: Sliding of Foundation
I am happy that all u guys spent time on this. I will let you all know.
Mathcadboy
The rationale I heard differed from each engineer to other. Some said it's too conservative.
One of the better reason from a senior was, post seismic tests indicated not much sliding on foundations, but he said the codes are silent on this and left it to engineers. having said that he added he would consider that force Risk cat IV structures just to cover his neck
RE: Sliding of Foundation
1) It should be calculated separately from the superstructure.
2) It should be based on the elastic response spectrum (R=1).
3) It should be based on a period of zero.
Because the seismic response spectrum drops off so sharply to the left of the constant acceleration transition period, this may lead to fairly minor seismic forces. Consider two possibilities:
1) short building with short period. The acceleration of the footing would be much less than the superstructure and forces wouldn't add up to much.
2) tall building with long period. Accelerations might be comparable but foundation weight would get lost in the noise of all the contributing seismic weight of the many floors above.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
For overturning moment, the foundation weight won't have a lot of effect due to being down low, the original question related to shear, where it would be more critical.
I believe all the seismic loading is tabulated for surface level, so at some depth down, you ought to get a little lower loading, also.
The seismic design forces aren't just derived from fundamental principles, they're all codified by committees, etc., so if you get into a situation not covered by the codes, you don't necessarily have a "right" way to do it, either.
If you consider what's happening in the foundation, you can also consider soil-structure interaction, which can lower the design loads.
In a few minutes googling around and looking through the bookshelf, I couldn't find anything really relating to the topic one way or the other.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
"As part of normal practice, all of the foundation weight and half of the first-story wall weight are commonly omitted in the analysis of seismic diaphragm loads (See Sec. 6.34). However, such a provision is not explicitly defined in the IBC for calculating base shear, nor is such a provision mentioned in the Blue Book commentary." Footnote, Page 6-24, "Seismic Design of Building Structures", 10th Edition, by Lindeburg and McMullin, parts of which are on Google.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
Thank you for ur input. I have that lindberg book, but I wanted similar statement from IBC or CBC (both are silent).
Also that may be ok for a multi story building as the foundation weight is relatively small. If I am designing a foundation for equipment (large), then i cannot agree with that ideology.
I dont this will have any impact on soil-struction interaction as this foundation will be like a needle in haystack.
this looks like a interesting topic, whom ever i asked in person, first reaction is "hmmmmm"
RE: Sliding of Foundation
RE: Sliding of Foundation
I am not violating the Fixed base assumption. that fixed base assumption is between superstructure and foundation, not between foundation and soil.
The only reason, to neglect the wt of foundation in multi-story bldg is, its a negligible wt compared to total super structure wt, not any other complex phenomenon.
RE: Sliding of Foundation
RE: Sliding of Foundation
Sorry, I see your point now. I was misunderstanding what you were trying to say until I created a paper model and it "clicked."