×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

datum question

datum question

datum question

(OP)
Hi,
I have a part that I am dimensioning, and I want to make sure I am correctly using datums. Is this the correct way to use the datums A and B that are not perpendicular to each other? I can call out a basic angle between -A- and -B- and then i can dimension from the "imaginary" surface that is perpendicular to -A-? Then I can put positional tolerances on the holes wrt -A- and -B-, but in reality it is really checked to -A- and this imaginary surface?

RE: datum question

You did not tell us how this part works, how thin it is and what are its relationships with the mating parts

RE: datum question

(OP)
it mates to a part that is almost the same as this one. 4 screws go through the 4 holes in the bottom left area of the part. It is about an 1/8" thick.

RE: datum question

In that case I would use the flat surface as primary datum feature and the pattern of the four holes as secondary ( at MMC) and then locate ( position and /or profile ) all the other features

RE: datum question

(OP)
ok but then where would i dimension from if I am using the pattern of holes as the datum feature. I am unsure of how to dimension off of a pattern.

RE: datum question

(OP)
after doing some research, it seems like it is not good practice to create a datum from a pattern of 4 holes which do not have simple geometric relations between themselves. The 4 holes that you are saying I should use a pattern to create a datum from have odd angles and distances to eachother.... Basically i just want to know if the way I currently have it (in the picture) with the datums is an acceptable way of using feature control frames. Thanks.

RE: datum question

Basic dimension to the features, basic angles, profile (all around for the rectangular features) for the outside edges
Basic dimensions to the cetner of the holes and then locate them (position)
Basic dimensions should come from the center of the pattern (most preferred solution)

RE: datum question

So, you are centering this part on something that has "odd angles and distances to each other". Interesting concept. is it a very robust design? Works (can you assemble it) ?
What is the scrape rate?


RE: datum question

Also, see fig 4-4/y14.5-1994
FIG. 4-4 INCLINED DATUM FEATURES

So, in your case you can use it, but is entire non-functional approach.


RE: datum question

I agree with greenimi that from a functional standpoint, it sounds like it would be best to use the flat surface as a primary and the pattern of holes as the secondary datum feature. While you may not be able to easily establish a "center" for the feature pattern, that is not strictly necessary, per ASME Y14.5-2009 Para. 4.12.3:

"The origin of the datum reference frame may be established at the center of the pattern of the datum feature simulator…, or at any other location defined with basic dimensions relative to the datum feature simulator…”

I believe this has been discussed a couple of times on this forum by people with a lot more experience than I have. Here are some relevant threads you can look through

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=364740

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=283384

RE: datum question

(OP)
@greenimi, thanks for the info and figure 4-4 is where I originally got the idea from. It makes sense to me with my minimal machining experience that this would be easiest for the machinist to use these two surfaces as Datums (the ones i have in the picture above, and in figure 4-4) vs establishing datums off of a hole pattern. From a functional standpoint, however, once i did more research I see you are correct it should be off of the hole pattern, I was not familiar with this so I was skeptical... now I changed my drawing. Thank for all the help/lessons.
@M4C7, thanks for pointing out that the part does not need to be dimensioned off of the center of the holes, this will most likely make things much easier for me

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources