INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

hydrostatic pore pressure

hydrostatic pore pressure

(OP)
Hi everyone,

I am currently carrying out a study of the effect of rainfall on natural slopes for a dissertation, and the one outcome which I have considered is raising the GWL. I am studying various slope angles and heights and raising the GWL until a factor of safety of 1 is reached.

I have decided to choose zero pore pressure above GWL and hydrostatic below

I have a few disadvantages of these assumptions which I can discuss, I was wondering what everyone's view was on this in terms of disadvantages? and if anybody knows of similar studies?

Kind regards,

Anand

RE: hydrostatic pore pressure

Anand478 - have you done any literature searches. There are many papers out that cover this topic.
1. The Influence of rainstorm pattern on shallow landside by Tung-Lin Tsai
2. http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/docserver/fulltex...
3. http://rainfallthresholds.irpi.cnr.it/Article_MAP_...
4. http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/12/829/2...
5. http://people.bu.edu/sergio/CV/papers%20pdf/2003-h...
6. Cornforth's Book - "Landslides in Practice" - Chapter 5 on groundwater and Chapter 9 on infinite slope analysis
7. Bromhead's Book - "The Stability of Slopes", 2nd Ed - Chapter/section 5.12 on infinite slope and Appendix E
8. Abramson et al Book - "Slope Stability and Stabilization Methods" - Chapter 3 on groundwater and Chapter 6 on analyses

I hope that the above gives you a start . . .

RE: hydrostatic pore pressure

First disadvantage is that you cannot put 0 PWP above GWL in clays , they usually have negative PWP which improve stability .
Your assumptions can only be used for coherent materials , other than that cohesionless materials only fail if the angle Beta is higher than the angle of friction of the soil independent of its height . Loose granular materials can liquefy in the presence of water too.
Some clayey material suffer from chemical alteration as well as seepage forces that you must add to PWP .

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close