×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.
2

PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

(OP)
I know the topic of PEMB foundations has been covered pretty heavily in this forum but I couldn't find this topic specifically addressed. I apologize if I missed it and this post is redundant.

Is there any reason that hairpins in the slab could not be utilized in combination with sliding friction under the footing to achieve the required factor of safety against sliding? Disregard passive pressure at this point since I understand there is some controversy about utilizing sliding friction and passive pressure together. For instance. assuming sliding friction under the footing achieves a factor of safety against sliding of 1.0 could hairpins into the slab be utilized to achieve the required 1.5 assuming they meet all the strength requirements, slab configuration, etc.

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

Yes...hairpins can be used to engage the slab; however, you will have to decide just how much area of the slab the hairpins engage for your friction calcs.

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

(OP)
Just to clarify, I will be using the friction under the footing not under the slab. I will be tying across the building with the slab and will not need to utilize friction under the slab to achieve the extra factor of safety. I don't see any reason I can't use these two resisting forces together but I wanted to make sure I am not missing something. Thanks for responding.

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

Whether or not you consider the slab friction, the slab mass will add to the footing mass depending on the influence area of the hairpins.

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

I'd say that this would depend on your details:

1) What is the elevation difference between top of slab and underside of footing?

2) Beyond the hairpins, what is the mechanism for resistance? Friction between SOG and soil? Tension tie to the other side of the building?

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

(OP)
The elevation difference between the top of the slab and the bottom of the footing is 64". 40" tall pier with 24" thick footing.

The footings were designed to be independent. The intended mechanism for restraining sliding was supposed to be shear friction at the base of the footing and passive pressure strength of the soil using pretty conservative values and neglecting the frost depth. The only problem is a factor of safety was missed on the controlling load combination for sliding. At this point hairpins can still be added to tie into the slab and increase the restraint. The required factor of safety can be achieved with the friction at the base of the footing and hairpins; neglecting passive pressure altogether.

Thoughts?

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

Given the elevation difference, I feel that the hairpins and would be the stiffer load path and resist most of the shear initially. If the hairpin load path can yield in a ductile fashion and redistribute the subsequent shear to the footing, then I think that you're okay to sum the capacities. If the hairpin load path will fail in a brittle fashion, I'd be skeptical of you being able to develop both capacities simultaneously.

Can you not use friction and passive resistance together if you're willing to tolerate some significant movement at the ultimate limit state? I struggle with this aspect of foundation design. The Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual specifically cautions designers regarding using multiple mechanisms at once. But then a lot of commonly employed designs don't check out if you limit yourself in that way.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

(OP)
I see your point regarding the stiffer load path. I suppose the elongation of the reinforcing steel in the slab and the hairpin itself could yield. Of course there would be some cracking in the slab but the likelihood of this maximum load is low.

Passive strength and shear friction are not enough by themselves to obtain the 1.5 S.F. Unless you are talking about combining the passive, friction, and hairpins all together?

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

I was only thinking of combining passive and friction. I mistakenly thought that would have been sufficient.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

What's the rationale for neglecting frost depth for passive pressure?
When frozen, the passive pressure (extent of soil engaged) would increase.
The only condition I can think of that would decrease PP is when soils are thawing, the thawing interval can have excess moisture and be "softer" for a period. I can see reducing the soils friction angle thus PP value in that interval, but include its mass so not reduce PP in the underlying soil.

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

(OP)
I'm not a geotech but every time I have asked about this they have told me I need to neglect it. I can't tell you why. I have just been blindly trusting their recommendation. Since there was no getoech report on this project I was trying to play it very conservative.

RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

I think the idea is to bear laterally on undisturbed soil, and frost penetration "disturbs" the soil, increasing the volume.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: PEMB Foundation - Hairpin Used in Combination with Footing-Soil Friction to Obtain Required F.S.

Personally, if the hairpins ever get beyond (2)#5's, I go to a direct tension tie across the bottom of the mainframe below the slab.

The first line of defense is the hairpin/tension tie. The dead load of the slab developed in friction will try to resist the spread if the slab develops a vertical crack from the tension somewhere. The friction can only be engaged if the slab cracks and lateral movement is precipitated. Then the passive pressure comes into play as the spread increases to eventually (hopefully) reach equilibrium.

That's the way I see it.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources