would you use implicit or explicit for this?
would you use implicit or explicit for this?
(OP)
A whipping motion of a thin sheet. There is a wave that moves through the sheet then I am getting errors with individual elements lighting up and then it aborts.
I'm using a quasi static implicit analysis with no damping as its not actually a sheet and it would likely be heavily damped as the real life scenario is submerged in fluid.
Bit of a strange one I know but any help is appreciated!
I'm using a quasi static implicit analysis with no damping as its not actually a sheet and it would likely be heavily damped as the real life scenario is submerged in fluid.
Bit of a strange one I know but any help is appreciated!





RE: would you use implicit or explicit for this?
RE: would you use implicit or explicit for this?
RE: would you use implicit or explicit for this?
You may want to consider modeling the fluid either with:
CEL (coupled eulerian lagrangian) which is great for mud or putty
or
FSI (fluid structure interaction) where deformable bodies are interacting with fluids such as water or air.
I hope this helps.
Thank you.
Rob Stupplebeen
OptimalDevice.com
My Personal WP
RE: would you use implicit or explicit for this?
RE: would you use implicit or explicit for this?
If you have a wave like phenomena I dont see why you would not want to use explicit, after all the waves motion will be time dependent.
RE: would you use implicit or explicit for this?