×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Reverse Engineering versus Auto Surfacing

Reverse Engineering versus Auto Surfacing

Reverse Engineering versus Auto Surfacing

(OP)
Hello,

I recently got a some parts scanned using a handy Handyscan700. I am now chosing which level of post processing is best for my purposes but am having difficulty. They provided two samples, one is done with reverse engineering and one is done with auto surfacing. I am having trouble deciphering which one is more accurate and cost effective.

I imagine the reverse engineering is more time consuming because it is more manual work using best fit lines. It looks much cleaner than the auto surface but if it is less accurate and more expensive, why would I ever choose it over the auto surface?

My needs are to be able to make fixtures, jigs, and steel plates that follow the curves. Accuracy to +/- 1mm is ideal.

I attached a photo with both samples inserted, reverse engineering on the left and auto surfacing on the right.

What do you think?

Thank you

RE: Reverse Engineering versus Auto Surfacing

No idea although it looks like the reverse engineering is a better surface.

Is Reverse Engineering an Add on? Auto surfacing as well?

Thanks

John

RE: Reverse Engineering versus Auto Surfacing

(OP)
They are services provided by the company that did the scanning. Very expensive work billed by the hour, don't think they use your everday CAD software like Solidworks, NX, etc...

RE: Reverse Engineering versus Auto Surfacing

If I guess, the reverse engineered is at least 2x the price of the auto surfaced thing.
The auto surfaced thing consists of "loads" of small faces. Each face "can" contain a bump, and there is no human eye which tries to make it not happen.
If i was to mill this model, i would go reverse engineered. I have seen these auto surfaced models in the toy industry where "bumpiness" doesn't matter that much. Kids don't bother, or nobody is prepared to pay for toys without the bumps smile
But you are not to cut that model, only create the fixtures / toolings ? Then the price might be more relevant.-> Auto surf.
The large number of faces will have a negative effect on performance. Drawing updates will take longer time.
If you create very complex toolings and need to find parting lines / split bodies to create dies etc, the number of faces and the relative inaccuracy will be negative.
- The "cleaner" model the simpler to create molds etc for.


Regards,
Tomas

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources