×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

How to assume bank full elevation to find the travel time in channel?

How to assume bank full elevation to find the travel time in channel?

How to assume bank full elevation to find the travel time in channel?

(OP)
I'm fairly new to this much in-depth study of hydrology and hydraulics; so forgive me if I sound ignorant. I used to use mainly the Rational Method; now I'm using TR-55 and HEC-HMS. Most of the drainage areas I come across are less than one square mile or 640 acres.
My question is this: when using TR-55 and trying to figure the channel travel time, how do I go about assuming what the bank full elevation is of the channel? Once i figure what that is, I can figure out what the velocity is, then the travel time.

Thanks everyone!

RE: How to assume bank full elevation to find the travel time in channel?

Bankfull means filled up to the top of the bank.

Perhaps I misunderstand your question?

What you're going to discover for watersheds your size, is that your Tc is going to be heavily influenced by your sheet flow assumptions, even though the sheet flow is a relatively small portion of the flow path. That means you really have to use good engineering judgment on selecting a flow path that you feel is representative of the site. I also recommend vetting the Tc you calculate against several different methods that aren't so sheet flow dependent.

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

RE: How to assume bank full elevation to find the travel time in channel?

(OP)
Hi Beej67,
I'm sorry; what I meant by 'how do I go about assuming what the bank full elevation is of the channel' is how do I figure out what that elevation is, in feet? There's no survey, so I can't get it that way. With me being a 'newbie' at this, I'm sure I'm missing something to help me figure out what the elevation is. Then, I guess with that, I can deduce that is the depth of the water? Also, how to figure out what the cross sectional area is or wetted perimeter? I would have to have at least one of these items and depth to figure out the rest of the items for deducing the travel time in the channel.

The site I'm currently figuring the travel time in the channel is a tributary feeding into a reach, which then has another tributary feeding into it further downstream. This reach takes the water to the cross drain structure and under the roadway. The tributary area has a sheet flow area, which then turns into shallow flow. After shallow flow, then the channel starts as there is a 'blue line' to denote this channel in this drainage area. The attached pdf file shows the arrow which points to the beginning of the channel in the drainage area.

RE: How to assume bank full elevation to find the travel time in channel?

You can also use an iterative process: Take a guess at the flow depth so you can determine the approximate Tc and get an initial peak runoff. Use this peak to determine the actual flow depth and adjust the Tc accordingly.

As beej67 stated, your channel flow time is probably a small fraction of the overall Tc. You'll also find that the channel velocity doesn't change much with modest changes in depth. So in the end, knowing the exact flow depth has a minimal effect on the results. If in doubt, do a quick sensitivity analysis.

Peter Smart
HydroCAD Software
www.hydrocad.net

RE: How to assume bank full elevation to find the travel time in channel?

well, if you dont have a surveyed channel slope or cross section, you have options. a) make an assumption based on the map b) field trip and take along a tape measure and a level c) send out the survey crew to get cross sections. If there is water in the channel than you will have to estimate anyway. dont forget the camera. n value might be just as important as the slope or cross section. realize that most natural channels are highly variable, so you will need to simplify and use conservative, engineering judgement. channels may or may not handle the design flood, so they might or might not be bank full.

RE: How to assume bank full elevation to find the travel time in channel?

Obviously, it is best to have the most accurate data possible as mentioned (survey, field check etc.) However, I thought I would offer some other lower accuracy aides as well: USGS, or other topo data. Some LIDAR data is pretty accurate, however it often does not capture the definition of smaller channels.

In your case, if I could not acquire the preferred data, I fell back to Google Maps. There is a Street View of the channel where it reaches the highway. The estimate I could make on channel dimensions referencing other visible features (fence posts) would certainly be better than nothing. And as CVG mentions, one can use the street view photo to get an idea of what mannings n would be applicable.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources