## Using slope stability software to determine internal forces

## Using slope stability software to determine internal forces

(OP)

Is it possible/practical to use slope stability software to determine internal forces on a wall?

One question that always bothers me is how to "accurately" account for offset surcharges and / or the influence of a tired wall upper wall on a lower wall when determining internal pressures/forces. Having said that...

Can you set up a slope stability model with your wall geometry, for this example lets say it is a vertical wall with tiebacks. Input your soils stratums and slopes. Now Enter horizontal forces at your tieback locations, iterate the force until you reach the desired FS (usually between 1 and 1.3 in US). These are then anchor forces due to soil pressure, you could then apply a surcharge and find your anchor forces due to the surcharge (by again iterating).

You could then assume a soil pressure distribution and back solve for an equivalent Ka for soil pressure and again backsolve for a Ka for the surcharge, right? In the case of a tieback wall you might assume a trapazoidal shape, but you could use this same method but now for a cantilever concrete retaining wall, right? Except for a cantilever wall, or really any "gravity" type wall you would apply your horizontal force (in the slope stability model) at 2/3H from the top of the wall. Again iterate the force and backsolve for Ka?

Am I losing it here or is this reasonable?

I suppose this question leads to why not design all walls using the mechanics of slope stability to determine internal / external pressures... Probably leads to unnecessary over complication...

One question that always bothers me is how to "accurately" account for offset surcharges and / or the influence of a tired wall upper wall on a lower wall when determining internal pressures/forces. Having said that...

Can you set up a slope stability model with your wall geometry, for this example lets say it is a vertical wall with tiebacks. Input your soils stratums and slopes. Now Enter horizontal forces at your tieback locations, iterate the force until you reach the desired FS (usually between 1 and 1.3 in US). These are then anchor forces due to soil pressure, you could then apply a surcharge and find your anchor forces due to the surcharge (by again iterating).

You could then assume a soil pressure distribution and back solve for an equivalent Ka for soil pressure and again backsolve for a Ka for the surcharge, right? In the case of a tieback wall you might assume a trapazoidal shape, but you could use this same method but now for a cantilever concrete retaining wall, right? Except for a cantilever wall, or really any "gravity" type wall you would apply your horizontal force (in the slope stability model) at 2/3H from the top of the wall. Again iterate the force and backsolve for Ka?

Am I losing it here or is this reasonable?

I suppose this question leads to why not design all walls using the mechanics of slope stability to determine internal / external pressures... Probably leads to unnecessary over complication...

## RE: Using slope stability software to determine internal forces

There are some people who want to do the analysis in a slope stability manner but it is not as simple as a couple slope stability runs and the results are different than conventional theory. The FS would still have to be 1.5 like it is for the conventional calculations not 1.3.

There is merit in this approach when the procedures are refined but it will probably require specialized software or methods to do the analysis properly, probably more like finite element analysis. It will also require some changes in the way stresses and pullout are looked at. I think it is probably ok for the external stability analysis for obtaining magnitude of thrust on a wall but using it for the internal design may be going step too far at the current time.

Pretty complicated subject to discuss in a forum without all the figures, diagrams, equations, etc.

## RE: Using slope stability software to determine internal forces

I mean no disrespect when I say this but that statement always tugs me the wrong way...Discussion is what forums are for... Now having enough time to present the information is a different story and can completely understand that. I suppose the two go hand-in-hand.

EIT

www.HowToEngineer.com

## RE: Using slope stability software to determine internal forces

## RE: Using slope stability software to determine internal forces

As far as my comment about complexity goes, forums are a great place to discuss concepts but they are not most people's full time job. I typically do not have the time to prepare exhibits and papers for extensive review and discussion which is sometimes required with certain topics. A picture is worth a thousand words as they say and I wish I had the time to do this full time, maybe when I retire....

Dcarr82775 - Yup, sounds like what I have done on occasion. The problem is what to do with the answer and how to apply it. For example, the thrust on a vertical wall and battered wall will be about the same via slope stability but a retaining wall analysis would say that the battered wall has less thrust on it. So what do you do with these two answers?

## RE: Using slope stability software to determine internal forces

I prefer trial wedge when the problem lends itself to it. I trust the spreadsheet I wrote more then the program I did not.

## RE: Using slope stability software to determine internal forces

If you are comfortable with equivalent beam method and you have a beam analysis spreadsheet, you can solve for anchor force(s) by entering the sum column as a distributed load on the beam and anchor force will be a support. No iterations to worry about.

http://www.soilstructure.com/

## RE: Using slope stability software to determine internal forces

Thanks!

EIT

www.HowToEngineer.com