×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Gradually Varied Flow - Normal Depth US HW?

Gradually Varied Flow - Normal Depth US HW?

Gradually Varied Flow - Normal Depth US HW?

(OP)
Flow Regime: Sub-critical & open surface flow

In a scenario where one needs to do backwater calculations for a channel / culvert in subcritical flow, is assuming normal depth as the US water level acceptable? At some point the backwater calculations will converge to normal depth, but I've never read anywhere where it is acceptable to use the normal depth. I assume this is because it may not converge by the time you hit your next analysis point?

RE: Gradually Varied Flow - Normal Depth US HW?

If you already know it's subcritical regime, the upstream boundary condition shouldn't matter. You should be making assumptions for the downstream boundary condition, and then calculating the depths upstream based on that downstream assumption. Does that make sense?

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East - http://www.campbellcivil.com

RE: Gradually Varied Flow - Normal Depth US HW?

No. Upstream boundary condition is only used to analyze supercritical flow.

Refer to Open-Channel Hydraulics. Ven Te Chow. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959

RE: Gradually Varied Flow - Normal Depth US HW?

(OP)
Thanks beej67. I was trying to avoid doing backwater calculations completely (setting up a spreadsheet without using macros) by just assuming that the normal depth of the culvert/channel upstream location was the HW if it is "close enough" to the actual depth... However, I have recently realized that since culverts are so hydraulically short, it will often not be close enough to assume normal depth at the upstream side since there isn't enough length to normalize back to normal depth.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources