×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Unexpected Modal Participation Factor Results and Inconsistencies

Unexpected Modal Participation Factor Results and Inconsistencies

Unexpected Modal Participation Factor Results and Inconsistencies

(OP)
I'm attempting to extract modes of interest from a model. I expected this to be somewhat straightforward: run a frequency analysis and downselect modes based on frequency and the modal participation factor/effective mass. My model is basically a constant thickness shell of one material tied to a variable thickness shell of a different material, essentially, a tube with insulation. When I looked at the participation factors, I expected to see the first bending, torsion and elliptical modes dominate the participation factor accounting for a larger portion of the response. This wasn't the case, in fact, the first bending mode's participation factor was basically in the noise compared to some higher frequency localized modes.

I did some more digging and found that the modal participation factors output by Abaqus varied depending on how my model was setup. Originally, I created an assembly of two parts representing each shell. I updated my model to create a flattened input file without parts/assemblies. The frequencies reported matched dead on, but the participation factors varied wildly with the largest value coming from wildly different modes depending on which model I was looking at. This was in 6.14-1. Running the same models in 6.13-1 gave the same mode for the largest modal participation factor, but other smaller, but still significant, values did not match up well at all. Running either model in both versions of Abaqus gave different values as well.

To dig down further, I created some simple models to try to figure out what was going on. I created a rectangular beam and extracted the mass matrix and mode shapes from Abaqus. I used an existing MATLAB routine on hand to separately calculate the same thing for both simply supported and free-free boundary conditions. I found that calculating the modal participation factors (for x, y and z-rotation for the beam in a plane) outside of Abaqus, the x-values calculated from the Abaqus matrix and shapes matched exactly with the values reported by Abaqus (no matter the magnitude, ie, the modes with a value O(10^-2) matched to the same number of decimals as those with values O(10^-18). This was not the case for the y and z-rotation values. The values with larger magnitudes matched reasonably well, but the smaller values were generally off by orders of magnitude. I did at least see the trends I expected as far as the first bending mode having a large participation factor, which then reduced considerably for higher modes.

I tried to replicate the issue I was seeing with strange/unexpected modes having high participation factors and expected ones have negligible values by creating a beam consisting of two shells tied at the centerline, but was unable to replicate the weirdness seen in my full model. Any suggestions on additional steps to try? I'd like to replicate the issue in order to send a model off to Abaqus support since I'm unable to send my actual model.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources