×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rod Shape Function

Rod Shape Function

Rod Shape Function

(OP)
Good evening all,

A very simple question, might seems obvious but I'm started to get confused...

When dealing with bar, the usual shape function is a linear one: N(x)=ax+b

However, I wonder why don't we choose a degree 2 shape function after all? The exact solution of the displacement is polynomial (degree 2)

Perhaps, it's because we assume that strain=du/dx=constant, in the small displacements assumption?
In that case that would justify the linear interpolation of the displacement.

So I'm still a bit in the dark, and I cannot find any answer to that question!

Thanks for your help big smile

Tom

RE: Rod Shape Function

Tom - yes, in a linear elastic analysis both axial and bending displacements are assumed to be negligible.

Doug Jenkins
Interactive Design Services
http://newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com/

RE: Rod Shape Function

(OP)
Thqnks IDS, so in theory it would not be impossible to have a bar element with 3 nodes and 3 shapes functions, but it would not be relevant in line with linear elastic?

I have also noticed in Patran, there is only one option for rod element; so I believe the linear shape function is the best option.

What about the other software?

Thanks!

Tom

RE: Rod Shape Function

there are FE codes with 3 node (ie parabolic shape function axial members (RODs and BEAMs) to be compatible with parabolic shell elements; but NASTRAN prefers you combined a parabolic CQUAD8 with 4 linear CRODs. Yes, you're correct that they are incompatible shape functions but that's what NASTRAN makes you do. Why ? you'd need to ask them that !

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources