×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ETABS Walking Colum

ETABS Walking Colum

ETABS Walking Colum

(OP)
Has anyone tried to obtain floor diaphragm forces resulting from walking columns from ETABS?

RE: ETABS Walking Colum

I haven't tried it but I've considered it. It seems to me that you'd either need to:

1) Model your columns as finely meshed walls or;
2) Model your columns as diagonal members running between overlap zones.

The point being that I don't think that modelling the columns using vertical line elements would produce the diaphragm forces that you're looking to capture.

I'm curious to see how this works out for you.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: ETABS Walking Colum

In order to keep it simple, I would try to model a frame element of an assumed effective width (say 8') and get the forces on that discrete element. In order to get the moment due to eccentricity, you would have to model a "rigid" link supporting the walking column. I have done (2) as KootK suggests and designed the transition reinforcement. A simple check would a T/C check based on the floor-to-floor height, but if that is too conservative, you might consider additional diaphragms.

RE: ETABS Walking Colum

(OP)
Thanks guys.

I have tried modelling the columns as walls. I am taking the shear force at the transition level as the diaphragm force at that level, though another engineer at my work suggests we should be taking the shear difference between this level and the level below. This would give me a lower diaphragm force.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources