×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

(OP)
I have a condition where the pre-engineered building we have is on a sloped grade but the architect wants the rigid frames to be the same size so at one end the pier comes up to grade and then as the grade slopes down the top of pier stays at the same elevation until the last rigid frame is sitting on a 5'-6" high pier (4'6" above grade and 1'-0" below.

The concern I have is that by just looking at the pure statics of it, the reactions in the hairpin ties going into the slab would appear to be significantly increased for this condition due to the lever action.

To clarify I have a 50 kip horizontal reaction at the top of the pier, then 4'-6" down to my slab, then another foot down to my 2ft thick footing.

Am I over thinking this or will the reaction in the hairpins be much larger like I'm thinking in this case? Any suggestions to lower it?

RE: Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

Much larger if you intend on resolving all of the overturning in the slab and none in the footing.

Elsewise, you could design the footing and pier to resist all of the overturning (likely an unfeasible footing size) and the slab technically wouldn't need to provide any lateral support.

RE: Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

If the horizontal reactions are directly resisted by the hairpins, why would the forces in the slab not be equal and opposite?

DaveAtkins

RE: Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

The forces in the slab are equal and opposite. I understood his question as, if my pre-eng frame column sits on a pier 4'-6" above my slab is the force going into the slab higher than when the pre-eng frame column sits on a pier at the top of slab.

As I noted, it depends on how you are resolving the lateral forces, assuming a pin connection for your footing then yes the load into your slab would increase.

RE: Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

(OP)
Here is a sketch of what I was talking about. Now that I've sketched it out I think I just need tie rods connecting the foundation to the opposite side instead of going into the slab assuming I can get the overturning to work out. Thanks for your replies.

RE: Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

Can you run the frame down to the slab like you typically would with simple metal buildings, and then encase the frame in concrete to the 4'6" elevation the architect wants? That might be your easiest solution.

RE: Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

I would tell the architect to get real, or you're going to have to buttress the heck out of it, and add a huge footing.

RE: Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

You could install a grade beam flush with the top of the slab and bottom of the footing, or deeper, to develop the moment, tying the grade beam to the column at the opposite end of the frame.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

Couple of observations: 1) your numbers are not right, unless you have added in a 1.5 x's Factor of Safety in; and 2) I would model to the center of the footing (as a minimum) and add a fixed base there. This greatly reduces the lateral forces. You will still end up with a large footing. See no way around that.

gjc

RE: Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

Why are you using hairpins with this system? Like others, I tell my client to run the columns down to top of slab or better yet in this instance, top of footing. Otherwise, I would just design a huge footing and be done with it. If I had 50kips in a column at SOG level I would more than likely use tie rods across the building as the hairpins are trying to do too much.

RE: Pre-Engineered Rigid Frame on Tall Pier

it seems like your free-body diagram is off to me. shouldn't you be balancing the overturning forces at the bottom-left point on the base of the footing. there must be some very significant down forces to generate a 50 kip outward horizontal force (maybe snowloading condition). those downforces would resist overturning moment with a lever arm of the 1/2 the footing. not saying it does all the work but it certainly is a big part.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources