×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Moving Between Job Roles

Moving Between Job Roles

Moving Between Job Roles

(OP)
I'm a senior in mechanical engineering expecting to graduate in May 2015 with a BS. I'd like to get a job that involves some sort of design, analysis, R&D, or some other serious technical component. However, it looks like I'll end up with a job as either an Applications Engineer doing glorified tech support, a Field Engineer being a glorified technician, or perhaps another option that involves a dubious amount of "real" engineering. How hard would it be to transition to the kind of work I want to do from one of these types of roles? Would taking an applications engineering job pigeonhole me or would it be realistic to do something design/analysis oriented after 2 or 3 years? I know I'll need a MS to do the really interesting work, but due to the cost, I'd like to postpone it until I can get an employer to pay for it.

RE: Moving Between Job Roles

If you've used or maintained the type of equipment that you'll be designing, then it could be very beneficial experience. I know a few design engineers who should go out and try to use or build the stuff these design, because they would have more idea what works well and what doesn't. Don't under-estimate the value of practical experience. smile

RE: Moving Between Job Roles

Applications Engineers and Field Engineers are directly involved in solving customers' problems. Do not continue to sneer at their contributions.

A kid with a PhD is worthless for design, analysis, R&D, or any other serious technical component, unless (s)he has also learned which end of the soldering iron to pick up.

I should also note that AEs and FEs are closer to the corporate money stream than are the R&D design monkeys kept in the room behind the back room, so they are more likely to paid well, or at least well enough.

Further, their role as the company's (inter)face to the customer, and their visibility to the company's Big Guy makes them somewhat less likely to be RIFed when hard times come, and better positioned to find another slot when really hard times come.

You're probably all lathered up about cool stuff like doing FEA. You'll be less enthusiastic about it when you've spent years analyzing stuff that others have synthesized, predicting how it will fail, seeing it go into production anyway, and watching it fail exactly as you predicted. Product evolution is a very messy process, and is more politicized than anyone wants to admit. You can't steer it at all unless you're The Big Guy, and the people who have the skills to get there, by the time they do, don't have the proper and current technical skills to do the steering anyway.

Your mileage may vary, but odds are against it.

Mike Halloran
Pembroke Pines, FL, USA

RE: Moving Between Job Roles

workForFood,

In fact your view on the jobs you described seems quite limited. I think it would have been more wise that you asked about other's opinion on these jobs before doing your own assumptions.

Actually an AE job can have a high level of technical content, depending on the product/industry. But in general, you are more in contact with the real world ; you learn from client and you deal with sales/commercial forces - all that gives you an insight on the hidden part of the iceberg. You will learn about case history of failures, about all the mess that happened at site for such and such projet, of flawless delivery when things go well etc.
Actually you will be in position about making technical choices with your feet firmly on the ground, so you can educate the "pure engineers" on their approach because you can really see the theoretical BS they are doing when innovating without knowing about competitive aspects, about costs, about client conservatism etc. In short an AE can have a 360 degree vision and also is the best people to contribute to developing new products (incremental changes or breakthrough) because they understand the market/competition from both the sales and the technical stand points.

As for Field Engineer, it depends what you make out of it I'd say. Nothing would prevent one from studying some parameters of a machine, measuring others just to satisfy his/her own technical curiosity and understand the technical background - then he/she could have a real edge over the resident/office engineer, because of his/her exposure to all the field issues including: operation, maintenance, etc ; on top of this he/she also could bring a contribution to solving problems.

In fact, the more I evolve in my career, my engineer job appears to me as a journey and a process of maturity where you acquire a certain mental disposition to accept new tasks or missions (BTW even if these are dirty or routinely boring) that are presented to you ONLY because you cleared an accountability check, whereby you prove being capable of executing things till satisfactory completion. Sometimes theses tasks which are given to you, can have a high impact on society, economy, infrastructures, on quality of life and safety of the people in general. I think this is why (in general), these tasks are given to engineers (not often PhDs...but if you can do both fine).

"If you want to acquire a knowledge or skill, read a book and practice the skill".

RE: Moving Between Job Roles

I prefer if my jobs are more FE or AE in nature... that's where the real on-the-fly engineering takes place, the fun stuff. Personally, I wouldn't stick a fresh engineer in either of those positions. They just don't know enough to be useful yet.

Dan - Owner
http://www.Hi-TecDesigns.com

RE: Moving Between Job Roles

Scotty, Mike, rotw, & Mac are exactly right. Pay attention to what they say.

Of course, you're champing at the bit, your head filled with theoretical knowledge, ready to take the world by storm by doing what you've been doing for four years. Sorry to inform you, but your education is just about to begin.

If you really want to be locked away, nerd-style, in a back room staring at a monitor crunching numbers all day, then I'm sure there is a job for that somewhere. You'll learn how to drive a software package that has a half-life of two years. Getting your fingernails dirty, shoulder-to-shoulder with customers, helping them solve their problems, understanding their concerns & needs...that is knowledge and a skill set that will make you a powerful analytical / design engineer at a later time. I'm sure glad I spent my early time twisting wires, turning wrenches, banging out programs in the middle of the night, and learning how to make it happen before the next shift started.

TygerDawg
Blue Technik LLC
Virtuoso Robotics Engineering
www.bluetechnik.com

RE: Moving Between Job Roles

You're not going to be a "glorified" anything, at least not for the first year or so. People may resent you because you think you know more than you really do.

You might need to define what you think "real" engineering is. Real engineering is paperwork, emails, trying to juggle multiple tasks and deadlines, and learning to work with a team.

RE: Moving Between Job Roles

(OP)
Thanks for the replies. My idea of these jobs is actually what some of my friends in these jobs who graduated last year have told me. They generally hate their jobs and feel like they aren't real engineers. I don't doubt that these types jobs are important and can be useful experience even if my friends' jobs are bad. I guess they might just be facing the reality that work will rarely be fun or glamorous no matter what. Hard to say.

My real concern is that most jobs want not just experience but relevant experience. If I accept a job that is on the opposite end of the spectrum from what I want in terms of function, is it going to be hard to transition in the future without starting at entry level again? Do employers care more about the industry you're coming from or your previous job function? Does it not really matter as long as you've been working as a mechanical engineer? I want to make sure I'm just paying my dues and not heading down the wrong path.

RE: Moving Between Job Roles

get your hands dirty, then start to engineer.
Where I work, I can tell from the work some people deliver, whether or not they've ever been in the "real" world or not.
It's very valuable experience.

RE: Moving Between Job Roles

Same here. You need to know how real things get built by real people before you start designing and analysing stuff.

Besides, the real world stuff is way more engaging. I'm a couple decades and change past graduation, and I'd rather be the field service engineer dealing with real things and real people than sitting cooped up at a desk in front of a computer.

RE: Moving Between Job Roles

I am a recent graduate my self so I cant give you much advice on the career path front. Lots of excellent advice has already gone your way. The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence. It is my experience that many young college graduates in many disciplines are misguided impression that someone is going to pay them lots of money to make decisions and do very little actual work. Design isn't all it is cracked up to be. Like another poster already said the design process is much more political than those who haven't observed it first hand expect. Documentation is much more tedious and time consuming that any school project you have ever had, and catching flack for third party review organizations not being able to turn around design packages to meet an unreasonable sales deadline is always tiring.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources