×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Dual Lateral Force Resisting System, Flexible Diaphragm, Different R values

Dual Lateral Force Resisting System, Flexible Diaphragm, Different R values

Dual Lateral Force Resisting System, Flexible Diaphragm, Different R values

(OP)
I am working on a high end 3 story apartment building. Footprint is long and skinny (70'x300'). So in the longitudinal direction seismic may control. This is wood bearing walls, with wood shear walls. On one side I have plenty of shearwall and also 3 masonry stair and elevator cores. On the other side i have windows...lots of windows. In 300' I bearly have 39' of usable shearwall. My question is...because i have a flexible diaphragm and the load to each shearwall line is attributed by trib area alone; then may i use a different R value for the wood shearwalls on the front of the building (6.5) and another R value for calculating the load on the CMU stair cores on the back side of the building (2) in a different shearwall line. I would usually conservatively go with the lower R value and design the shearwalls accordingly, however, because of the lack of shearwall length, the loading isn't feasible to resist with a wood shearwall. Thanks in advance for your input.

RE: Dual Lateral Force Resisting System, Flexible Diaphragm, Different R values

I have heard of varying R for different directions, but never in the same direction. I've always taken the worse R value too.

With the rigidity of the CMU walls being much greater, you are approaching a "C" shaped structure for your wall systems, and your center of mass will be different than your center or rigidity for the walls. I suspect that in the long direction of the building, due to the length of the diaphragm, it will behave more like a rigid than a flexible diaphragm. Definitely flexible across the short direction.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Dual Lateral Force Resisting System, Flexible Diaphragm, Different R values

Quote (msquared48)

I suspect that in the long direction of the building, due to the length of the diaphragm, it will behave more like a rigid than a flexible diaphragm

I agree with this. You would have a rigid diaphragm per the definitions on ASCE 7 and then treat the building as an eccentrically loaded system.

You would not use different R values for the same direction - you use the smallest R for dual or mixed systems.

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources