×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ACI 318-11 Shear Wall (phi) factor

ACI 318-11 Shear Wall (phi) factor

ACI 318-11 Shear Wall (phi) factor

(OP)
ACI 318-11 9.3.4(a) states that phi for shear "shall be .6 if the nominal shear strength of the member is less than the shear corresponding to the development of the nominal flexural strength of the member." Does this mean that if flexure governs then I have to use .6 for shear instead of .75? Does anyone have a better clarification for this? Thanks.

RE: ACI 318-11 Shear Wall (phi) factor

This is probably best illustrated via example. Imagine that your shear wall is cantilevered from the ground and is 10' long and 50' tall. The only load is a factored lateral load of 30 kip at the top.

1) Mf = 30 kip x 50' = 150 kip*ft

2) Let's say that your design Mn = 200 kip*ft. Capacity rarely matches demand exactly.

3) Vf = 30 kip. Given.

4) V_Mn = 200 kip*ft / 150 kip*ft * 30 kip = 40 kip. Amplified shear that would correspond to Mn.

5) IF [Vn < V_Mn (40 kip)] THEN phi = 0.6 ELSE phi = 0.75.

The concept is that shear demand is rarely expected to exceed that which would correspond to flexural yielding because flexural yielding would preclude the development of such a shear demand. Since a design where Vn > V_Mn is safer in this respect, phi can rationally be lower.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: ACI 318-11 Shear Wall (phi) factor

Quote (me)

phi can rationally be lower.

Correction: phi can rationally be higher.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources