×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Full diameter tubesheet vs single support tubesheet

Full diameter tubesheet vs single support tubesheet

Full diameter tubesheet vs single support tubesheet

(OP)
Can anyone help me to understand what are the advantagous of having a full diameter ( same diameter as girth flange with through bolts) tubesheet to single support tubesheet in a shell and tube heat exchanger? I am reviewing the design for AXU heat echanger and the vendor used single support tubesheet.
The design pressure 46bar on tube side and 25 bar on shell side.

RE: Full diameter tubesheet vs single support tubesheet

I see added strength in a full diameter TS due to the extended O.D.
some Mfrs use full dia. as they purchase B16 Blinds which is not longer allowed in ASME VIII1 work so now the smaller dia. is less expensive to make.

RE: Full diameter tubesheet vs single support tubesheet

Further, the thru-bolts give a guide for alignment of the head & divider plate to the receiving groove in the tubesheet. It is a little harder on the maintenance crew to properly 'stuff' a cleaned tube bundle, and get it rotated to the correct position with a smooth, small tubesheet. Large, easy to see in dim light, alignment marks on the shell flange and the tubesheet make this easier to get right. But trying to roll a smooth tubesheet and the attached bundle into exact alignment is tough.

If it were mine, and the bundle would require pulling annually or more often, a thru-bolted tubesheet makes more sense. Every hour you can save during a shut-down is precious. If not thru-bolted, then weld some 'ears' onto the rim of that smooth tubesheet, to give some purchase for the pry-bar being used for final alignment.

RE: Full diameter tubesheet vs single support tubesheet

Another benefit of bolted-through tubesheets is the ease of performing partial hydrotesting. You can connect either just the shell or just the channel to perform a partial hydrotest. For some exchangers this can make it a lot easier to detect bad tube-tubesheet joints before stuffing the bundle in the shell. Otherwise you need a separate split ring to perform a partial hydrotest.

RE: Full diameter tubesheet vs single support tubesheet

What marty007 said is correct. Full diameter tubesheeets are commonly found on only a few types of exchangers:

1) Where either shell or channel is integral with the tubesheet. C-type channels or fixed tubesheet exchangers. The non-integral component bolts to the tubesheet. A removable cover typically provides access to the tubefield for maintenance or pressure testing.

2) A removable-bundle exchanger with integral channel cover, or B-type head. In this case, as marty007 says, the bundle can be hydro'd either side. Also, the tubesheet bolting flange can incorporate a means to keep the shell gasket seated when the channel is removed for access to the tubefield. Either by tapped holes or collar studs in the tubesheet.

3) Removable bundle, vertical exchangers with stationary channel down, to retain the bundle if the channel is removed.

In any case the tubesheet bolting flange should be designed for hydro. See API 660 7.6.2.4 for example.

Full diameter tubesheets are really rare on exchangers with removable bundle AND removable channel covers, that is, A-type heads. If you want one on this type exchanger, better specifiy it.

Regards,

Mike

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources