×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Fire Rating UL v other

Fire Rating UL v other

Fire Rating UL v other

(OP)
I was recently told by an architect that if you are using a fire rated assembly other than UL rated assmeblies you need to de-rate the load capacity by 20%. I am in the US, and have not heard of this before. I found references to some things in Canada, but that is it. Anyone heard of this before?

RE: Fire Rating UL v other

My experience of if it is only in Canada. I never encountered it in the US. That being said, it's apparently to do with the difference between LRFD and ASD methodologies so, logically, it would affect US ratings the same way. Cross your fingers that you don't have to deal with this. It's a terrible pain.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Fire Rating UL v other

And the issue we have in Canada also applies to UL assemblies. Your architect may well be thinking of something entirely different.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Fire Rating UL v other

(OP)
That is what I gathered. Does Canada not allow ASD wood anymore? For whatever reason I do LRFD for everything except wood which I stubbornly insist on doing with ASD so the funky conversion factor doesn't enter the equation.

RE: Fire Rating UL v other

I am in the US and have always used UL ratings. I have never heard of someone using other than UL ratings.

There are some load reductions in joist capacities for UL ratings with spray on fireproofing but the loads are listed in various UL assemblies. Could this be what he is referring to? Get a reference from him......

RE: Fire Rating UL v other

Yeah, we're LRFD for wood nowadays.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Fire Rating UL v other

What a pain using LRFD for wood. Actually, what a pain using LRFD period. I only use it for concrete.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources