×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

(OP)
Does anyone know where I can find Coefficient of Drag for typical SHS and RHS sections. I have data for a square edge prism and a large rounded corner but not for corner radii typical of square and rectangular steel hollow sections.

RE: Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

Not worth refining down to that detail unless your doing some supersonic design. Just use a square section with square corners. If anything it will be very slightly conservative.

RE: Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

From Aus Wind Code (AS1170.2 Appendix E). Check out that Appendix for a good run down on drag coefficients for different structural shapes.

RE: Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

(OP)
Trenno, I saw that but for a 75x4 SHS the corner radius is about r/b=0.13. Sharp edge gives Cd=2.2. Interpolating I get Cd=1.8
I wonder if that is close and what about an RHS.

RE: Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

I've never really delved into exposed structural members getting hit by wind...

But surely the difference between 1.2 and 2.2 is not in the big scheme of things?

RE: Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

AASHTO Standard Specifications for Luminaries provides drag coefficients for various shapes.

RE: Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

(OP)
jreit, I don't have access to the AASHTO standard.

btrueblood, useful information. From what I have seen a useable approximation is
r/b
Cd
0.0
2.2
0.05
2.2
0.2
1.2
0.5
1.2

This ignores reduction that can occur due to Reynold's number.
In my case for r/b=0.13 I get Cd=1.7 which is a useful saving over a sharp corner at Cd=2.2

RE: Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

(OP)
I have found an answer in Eurocode 1 Actions on structures - Part 1-4 General actions - Wind actions, Clause 1 7.6 Structural elements with rectangular sections

https://law.resource.org/pub/eur/ibr/en.1991.1.4.2...

RE: Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

That drag coefficient is huge against structural members exposed to wind, that's all I deal with usually. We use ASCE 7-10, and the Code on wind loads on petrochemical facilities book. My boss wants to use 0.7 for Cf on Circular HSS beam, however I wouldn't mind going a little more into depth with this and finding out some kind of literature on this! If you can get this book - Wind Loads and Anchor Bolt Design for Petrochemical Facilities, it uses 0.7 for piping.

RE: Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

Wind loading on exposed members... Just use Cd = 2! Why waste your time.

If you really want to get technical, drag coefficients are basically characterized by:

1. Flow: Laminar or Turbulent
2. Form: Sharp edged or rounded
3. Longitudinal Length: Long or short
4. Shielding

The first two are intertwined. Sharp edged objects almost always have turbulent flow, rounded objects can be laminar at low fluid velocities (however for structual engineering ultimate wind will be turbulent). A circular (infinitely long) section will have Cd = 1.2 in laminar flow and Cd = 0.4 in turbulent flow when the boundary layer transitions. A long object will always have a high drag coefficient than a short one (out of plane to wind direction), as the fluid can't shed out of plane around the object. Then there's shielding; if the flow has become turbulent or somewhat disturbed before reaching the member in question, ascertaining a drag coefficient other than a conservative guess is futile. Basically it's too complex to waste your time with, and you should increase your beam size if you're concerned.

RE: Coefficient of drag for Rectangular Hollow Sections

I feel like the structure should be as efficient as possible and going overly conservative is good, however I like to design as light as possible b/c everything exponentially gets costlier the more conservative you get. A wind load on a 100 ft structure with 50 lbs/ft on your beams will result in ridiculous overdesigns from the top to the bottom. I want to design every structure with as much complexity and time as possible, even if my boss gets mad b/c its taking to long!

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources