×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

(OP)
I have an explosion proof electrical product that is getting a lot of mositure in it that I believe is condensation and I'm trying to prevent or reduce the condensation.
The product is installed outdoors in a very warm to hot rainy and humid environment. It is a NEMA 4 & 9 / IP66 rated enclosure. The electrical connection is through an explosion proof cable gland screwed into a 1/2" npt opening.
I believe warm moist air enters the device through the cable entrance and/or through the flame path of the device as it "breaths" throughout the day and night. There are no water marks on the flame path but there is calcuim deposits under the cable where it enters the product.

We cannot put a vent or drain into the device because of the Listings and Approvals of the device.

Would it help if the electrical connection was in conduit and a breather was installed in the conduit?

Any help is appreciated.

thanks,
mike

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

It is a common problem because of the weight (mass) of the EXP enclosures that causes them to thermally lag behind the environment's temp swings, resulting in the inside being below dew point frequently. It is in thru the flame path and your cable entry is not the problem unless you have some nefarious water situation where water is being delivered down the cable.

There are two solutions. One is to heat the enclosure. It doesn't take much at all, it just needs to be a few degrees above ambient to have all condensation stop. The other is to purge the enclosure, which works in some cases where a purge gas source is already present but is considerably more expensive if not.

For heating there are heater bars for just this purpose available.

Keith Cress
kcress - http://www.flaminsystems.com

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

You realize hopefully that there ARE explosion proof rated breathers and drains made for exactly this reason, right? So if you were aware of those, what is the objection to them? If you were not, here's what they are:

http://www.cooperindustries.com/content/dam/public...


"You measure the size of the accomplishment by the obstacles you had to overcome to reach your goals" -- Booker T. Washington

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

As Keith said, it doesn't take much heat. Typically the heaters are energized at 50% of rated voltage and energized 24/7. At 50% voltage the power consumption is low and the life is greatly extended. Heater failure alarms are also common.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

(OP)
I'm not sure a heater is an option. This product is an explosion proof pressure switch that is monitoring a fire sprinkler system. It is installed outdoors. I'm not sure what type of power would be available for a heater. Space inside the pressure switch is very limited.

I am aware of explosion proof vents and drains. My question about them was would they help if they were on the electrical conduit and not actually on the pessure switch? The electrical opening of this device is near the top, just below the removable cover.

There is only one conduit entrance to the device.

Why do you think the moisture is entering through the flame path instead of cable entry, because there is so much more of it? just curious.
I have seen pictures of the device and the flame path is clean and dry. The cable inside the device has water droplets on it and calcium deposits below it.

thanks,
mike

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

It's doubtful that moisture is entering through the threads. It's more likely that the air in the unit and the conduit feeding it provides enough moisture to condense. Is the conduit not sealed? This is a common issue with low energy instrumentation that uses intrinsically safe circuits. No need to seal the conduits so they don't, but that allows for enough air volume to create noticeable condensation. Can you seal the conduit or at least put a fitting in the conduit with a Y trap and a drain?


"You measure the size of the accomplishment by the obstacles you had to overcome to reach your goals" -- Booker T. Washington

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

(OP)
I'm not sure if they have conduit or not. I'm trying to find out. This installation is in Singapore. In some areas over there they just run cables to the device and the cable connects to the device through an explosion proof cable gland.

So I was wondering if a vent in the cable would work, then I could tell them to install the device using conduit and an explosion proof vent on the conduit as close to the pressure switch as possible.

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

You have mentioned calcium twice.
Condensation does not contain calcium.
I suspect that the switch may be leaking and allowing fire protection water into the enclosure.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

Calcium deposits, or aluminium corrosion byproducts?

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

mikeh6,
If your enclosure is flame proof and specified corectly it should have come with a "COMBINATION BREATHER & DRAIN" so that it can breath
due to temp variations and then you can drain the condensed moisture from bottom time to time. Also you have to seal properly
all conduits entering the enlosure to stop as much as possible the moisture coming to the enclosure. I believe it will reduce the moisture
condensation inside. If the enclosure is certified flame proof, then now you are not permitted to install a breather and a drain
to it due to insurance issues etc. Therefore, the best action I can see is to order a proper FP enclosure with a
breather and a drain and seal the conduits as much as possible coming to the new enclosure.

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

(OP)
The device is not leaking sprinkler water. The deposits must not be calcium, it is probably aluminum corrosion from the condensation.
I don't know if I can post a link on this site but I'll try. Here is a link to the product.
http://www.pottersignal.com/product/datasheet/5400...

As I mentioned, I do not know if conduit is being used. It may just be exposed cable connected through an explosion proof cable gland.

If I can get them to use conduit, would a vent in th econduit located near the pressure switch help?

thanks,
mike

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

(OP)
Please see the attachment. Do you think this would help allieviate the condensaton problem?
Even if they still use cable instead of conduit?
We can't put the vent or drain directly onto the product because of Listing and space issues so this would close nipple it to the product.

thanks,
mike

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

Hi Mike
The enclosure is aluminium and I assume the gland is brass? The moisture is causing galvanic corrosion between the two materials and aluminium being the anode is corroding. There is a galvanic voltage of 0.5V between the two materials. An aluminium gland would solve this problem if such a thing exists in a flameproof form. A plastic gland would be even better, they do exist with the relevant certification and would be the cheapest solution. Alternatively a plastic adapter between the gland and the housing would work as well. The condensation will still exist, but wont be caise any corrosion so you will be able to live with it.

RE: Condensation in explosion proof enclosure

(OP)
I'm not sure the gland is brass, it's hard to tell in the attached picture. Also, I can't live with the condensation, that is the problem. There is so much condensation inside the device that it is making the Microswitches fail. See the attached pictures.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources