×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Belled Pier Capacities

Belled Pier Capacities

Belled Pier Capacities

(OP)
Received a geotechnical report for a project site that has expansive clay soils. In the report is states that the belled pier capacity is to be reduced when the spacing of the bells is less than 3 bell diameters (clear space) based on the larger pier. The reductions are 40% for 2-3 diameters and 60% for 1-2 diameters.

Given that some of our columns are spaced rather closely together in certain areas we can't get many of the piers to converge on a solution. Does anyone have any literature on reduced capacity of belled piers based on proximity to other piers. I need some background knowledge so that I can convince the geotech to ease up on these reductions.



RE: Belled Pier Capacities

In the general, there is a reduced permitted loading because of zone of influence overlaps. It is not just for belled caissons. Check out Tomlinson or other foundation texts that discuss the topic.

RE: Belled Pier Capacities

Perhaps spread out the piers and use a pier cap between them to support the structure offset from the piers?

Check out Eng-Tips Forum's Policies here:
FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies

RE: Belled Pier Capacities

TXEng88 - Their may be an answer for you. You mention that the geotech's report states:

"...that the belled pier capacity is to be reduced when the spacing of the bells is less than 3 bell diameters (clear space)."

Spacing of 3 diameters is the commonly accepted spacing to prevent group action. This applies to both driven piling & drilled piers, whether they are point bearing or friction.

The loop hole you can present is that all credible references that I'm aware of measure the 3 diameters from center to center, not clear space - that is a big difference. Check out references such as "Principles of Foundation Engineering", by Braja Das. Also, make sure that you are reading the report correctly.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea
www.VacuumTubeEra.net r2d2

RE: Belled Pier Capacities

I'd get back to the geotech and ask if a lowered elevation of support might be considered to use at the currently recommended bearing pressure. I suspect the support capabilities there would be higher, meaning overlap concerns would be reduced.

RE: Belled Pier Capacities

Usually the limit we see is a spacing of 0.5 the bell diameter between bells. We deal with this a lot when we get into bin structures. These guidelines are usually quite arbitrary and if one is willing to pay the geotech to investigate a specific case it can save quite a bit of headache.

The pile diameter rule usually applies to skin friction piles, so it might be worth a call. The bell interaction should have more to do with the bulb around the bearing region. We put a lot of piles in CH or CM clay.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources