4" CMU on 8" CMU
4" CMU on 8" CMU
(OP)
I have an Arch. who want to use one course of 4" CMU on top of an 8" CMU foundation wall. She wants to do this as it is a slab on grade with 2x4 framed walls and does not want any CMU visible from the interior. (see attached - drawn as 2x6, but wants 2x4). I am pushing for a 2x6 wall so we can use 6" CMU and get some rebar in it, but she is hurting for interior space.
I was thinking about installing 1/2" threaded rod in the top one or two courses of the 8" CMU and trying to slide the 4" CMU over it and grout the 4" CMU with a sand mix (the rod would be used as the anchor bolts and reinforcing for the 4" CMU). Does this sound reasonable or are the face shell thicknesses different enough that this would not be possible?
I was thinking about installing 1/2" threaded rod in the top one or two courses of the 8" CMU and trying to slide the 4" CMU over it and grout the 4" CMU with a sand mix (the rod would be used as the anchor bolts and reinforcing for the 4" CMU). Does this sound reasonable or are the face shell thicknesses different enough that this would not be possible?






RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
You can also use an 8" shoe block (an L shaped block). That would be much more practical and would allow for reinforcing.
Can you get away with a 2x4 wall and still meet insulation requirements? Not sure where you are, but R19 insulation won't fit in a 2x4 wall.
When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty but when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong.
-R. Buckminster Fuller
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
8" Header blocks or similar restrain the slab leading to cracking and are no good for perimeter insulation.
All I really need is for the threaded rods to get thru the cores of the 4" CMU and it will essentially post-tension it once they are tightened.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
John F Mann, PE
www.structural101.com
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
That is thought, but would probably just switch the whole wall to concrete at that point to keep it under one trade. Might end up doing that as the house value could justify the extra expense.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
Better structurally and better insulation. It will require some additional coordination with the framing, but the contractor seems to feel it is the best solution.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
John F Mann, PE
www.structural101.com
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
Does not seem to be any worse for termites than the original detail. They will find ANY wood that is near grade. The wood will be at least 8" above grade and it is flat site. The framing will be flashed and insulated with blue board at the interface. The slab will bear on 2" of foam on 4" of washed sotne. It is unlikely that there can be a moisture problem. They will also likely use an in-wall insect treatment system such as this http://www.pestdefense.com/taexx. That is what the local tract builders use when they do a monolithic slab.
FWIW, Installing a concrete curb requires a significant amount of formwork.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
I'll see what I can do.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
I tried to explain, but I was "just" a B.Eng. Following this, and the gong-show that I had to get the company out of, I was placed in charge of monthly practical training sessions for all of the company's engineers.
I tell you what, I learnt more from the training sessions than I imparted on others. But never did we find a way to reliably reinforce a 4" CMU! lol.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
According to ASTM C90, a a "4" (4x8x16) unit is 3-5/8" thick x 7-5/8" high x 15-5/8" length. Apparently, there is some misconception of the specifications or just wrong terminology or usage.
The detail shown could be revised to show a 8" bond beam at the top of the 8" wall and then a 6" block (filled with grout) and appropriate reinforcement/bolts used for the 6" wall of the above structure.
I have no idea what the 3 units making up and 8" height are. They look like 2" or so high solid units that could be drilled. There are often 6x4x16 units that are used domestically and especially internationally, that have cores that will allow for reinforcement before grouting/filling.
According to most codes, 4" thick CMUs cannot be legally grouted because of the required size for a grouts space and coverage, but the they have been used for decades after approvals from nit-pickers.
That sure looks like a very neat and pretty detail drawing, but even more expensive to use.
Engineer and international traveler interested in construction techniques, problems and proper design.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
I think the idea should just be put to bed, and the issue explained yo the Architect. Best not to try something like this.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
"Much too likely to have widespread longitudinal cracking and not be able to perform…"
Can you elaborate on this?
Thanks
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
Such cracking tends to be related to the residual strain caused through the stack drying, kiln drying, or really any old type of drying in wood.
If you go to any lumber yard you'll quickly note that many 4x4 and larger, particularly square, members will have long cracks separating them into two or more "sub-elements". This is not particularly critical in their traditional uses (ie: low-load columns), but would start causing trouble if they were part of a shear transfer, collector, anchorage, etc.
Does that make my concern more clear?
If you want to pursue this, just use a double bottom plate where a single doesn't suffice.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
Anyhow, at this point I think the Arch. is just gonna have to accept a 2x6 wall.
It would be nice if someone would manufacture a thin-walled 4" CMU that could be used in this application.
FWIW, there are hundreds of houses built in our area that just use one or two courses of 4" brick instead of the proposed CMU. No rebar and the anchors just grouted into the holes of the brick. The Arch's think I am crazy not to sign off on things like this.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
Your concerns are rational, and your refusal to sign of commendable.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
I suppose the detail has about zero tolerance when you figure trying to line up anchor bolts and dowels. Maybe that in itself would talk me out of it. Yeah probably, use the 6".
EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
@RFreund - There is uplift as well and the prying force from the hinge to deal with. In reality, the 4" would probably work, just not meet code for grout space.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
Because between construction tolerances, insufficient space for grouting and the impracticality of wetting the interior surfaces and achieving a surface saturated dry condition in such a weird place without clear outs...
Just not a good idea. I doubt it would behave as you are thinking, but I will be the first to say I simply don't know. With that in mind it is once again not a good idea since we are meant TO KNOW our structures are safe.
Cue someone coming on to tell me I'll being overly conservative, and or dramatic.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
I think that your post-tensioning idea is really pretty clever. Suppose:
1) You shift the block wall towards the exterior such that it is centred under the 4" masonry. That way, you can sink your rods into the block below without being tight against the face shells.
2) You use whatever masonry product and anchor rod combination that allows you to pass the anchor rod through the masonry. Constructibility may be an issue. It would be ideal if it could be drilled in adhesive anchors.
3) Use a generous washer plate under your post-tensioned anchor rod nuts.
I don't love this, but I could live with it. Heck, given the scale of this, it could probably survive as unreinforced masonry if it could survive construction in the first place.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
Tons of these have been built un-reinfoced without any failures that I know about (yet)
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
Crossed-wires with the acronyms, I think.
KootK, I think XR250 was meaning for "PT" to be pressure treated, not post-tensioning...
Eng-Tips need a FAQ of engineering acronyms...so we all "speak" the same "language".
RE: 4" CMU on 8" CMU
@Ingenuity: both versions of "PT" have been discussed here, surprisingly. Although, given the particular situation, maybe "pretensioned" would have been a more apt term.
I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.