×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Current Limiting Fuses Class L and Class RK1

Current Limiting Fuses Class L and Class RK1

Current Limiting Fuses Class L and Class RK1

(OP)
IEEE 1584-2002 states that the formulas of Section 5.6 should be used for calculating arc-flash incident energies where current limiting fuses Class L and Class RK1 are used and the bolted three phase short-circuit current is within the appropriate current ranges.

The formulas of Section 5.6 are based on tests at 600V, 60Hz and a working distance of 455mm.

Question 1.
Do the formulas of Section 5.6 apply for 440V, 50Hz ?

Question 2.
What is the manufacturer of the fuses used to develop the formulas in Section 5.6 ?

Question 3.
The formulas of Section 5.6 are based on tests at 600V, 60Hz and a ‘working distance’ of 455mm.
The corresponding ‘gap’ for a ‘working distance’ of 455mm is 25mm for Low-voltage MCCs and panel boards.
Do the formulas of Section 5.6 apply for :
- ‘Gap’ of 25mm ?
- Arcing fault in a ‘box’ ?
- Earthed ( grounded ) system ?

Question 4.
The bolted phase fault current ( Ibf ) in the formulas of Section 5.6 are symmetrical rms current.
What effect does the actual system X/R and therefore current asymmetry have assuming the worst-case where the arcing-fault occurs at a voltage zero. ie. max asymmetry of arcing current ?

RE: Current Limiting Fuses Class L and Class RK1

(OP)
Question 5.
The formulas for incident energy in IEEE 1584-2002 Section 5.6 do not include arcing time.
How is the arc-flash boundary calculated when the arcing time is not known ?

RE: Current Limiting Fuses Class L and Class RK1

1. I see no problems applying the formulae to 50Hz system. Please consider IEEE 1584 empirical model suitable for frequencies of 50 Hz and 60 Hz when in doubt. Note also that the IEEE 1584 fuse equations were developed based upon testing at 600V. I would not take liberty applying them at different system voltage including 440V.

2. The IEEE 1584 states "These formulae were developed [...] using one manufacturer’s fuses". Looking on list of IEEE 1584 sponsors, it is quite obvious the formulae were derived using Bussmann product. However, there are more than one Bussmann current-limiting Class L and Class RK1 fuses and the guide does not mention what particular fuse families were used for testing. Therefore, I would not take chances applying the formulae even to Bussmann fuses. The IEEE 1584 statement "Fuses from one manufacturer were used, but results with other manufacturers’ fuses of the same class should be similar. The manufacturer should be consulted" indicates the authors are not quite confident that the fuse equations apply to Class L and Class RK1 fuses. I don't personally find the IEEE 1584 fuse equations helpful at all. In my opinion, the manufacturer had taken advantage of being a sponsor marketing its fuse products in IEEE 1584 guide.

3. IEEE 1584 indicates the formulae were developed for an arc in 20x20x20 in. size switchgear. The guide also indicates 1-1/4 in. gap for LV switchgear. I would not take chances applying the equations to other than the specified configurations.

4. Low voltage fuses are usually tested at 15% power factor associated with prospective peak current of 2.3 x the rms fault current. You can confirm it by looking on fuse peak let-through current characteristics. The 2.3 factor was chosen as a practical limit for low voltage circuits. Keep in mind the equipment X/R may have major impact on calculated available fault currents if the ratio is ignored when calculating the currents. Please check Beware of Simplistic Fault Current Calculations article by Keith Lane about this and other issues arising when equipment X/R ratios are not taken into account in short circuit analysis.

5. The arcing time is kinda built-in into the equations by means of fuse operating time as function of arcing current. I would suggest using IEEE 1584 Empirical model instead of IEEE 1584 Fuse Equations for arc flash analysis in systems protected by current limiting Class L and Class RK1 fuses. Typical arc flash software program would automatically determine arc duration based on the amount of predicted arcing current and fuse time-current characteristics (see arc flash calculation example for more information).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources