×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Restricted Earth Fault Protection
3

Restricted Earth Fault Protection

Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
I am presently testing an REF scheme on a 25MVA TX and was interested to know if anyone could tell me why the current measured by the neutral CT reverses direction when a winding fault occurs. Is it to do with the fault changing the earthed reference point on the winding causing it to act like a center tapped winding?

The TX is a delta/wye 33/11kV with the star point on the secondary solidly earthed.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

What is the pre-fault condition? It should be essentially zero. If so, the direction of a very small number is essentially unknowable.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
The pre fault condition in the test scenario would be a small amount of zero sequence current (above the required pick up value) flowing through the phase CTs to fulfill the requirements of the element under test. This current is required to determine the direction in the neutral CT. The neutral CT current would be in phase with this until such time as a winding earth fault to earth is detected. The neutral current reverses at this point and if its magnitude is greater than the pick up value, it trips.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

Hi, if you have a winding short circuit to the earth this means that you have a short curcuit insite of the zone of REF protection. This current in the CT will be opposite according to the "normal" current when the SC is outsite of the TX. It is better to simulate this current (fron neutral CT) with angle 180 deg. That means you have internal SC and the protection should trip it.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

2
The neutral current doesn't reverse, it is the terminal residual current that would reverse. For an out of zone fault there would be current up the neutral and out of the terminals. For an in zone fault there would be current up the neutral and in to the terminals.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
Yes. Thank you for your responses. I understand that the current does change direction. My question is, why

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

Current is toward the fault. If the fault is right of the terminal CTs the current will be to the right; if the fault is to the left of the terminal CTs the current will be to the left.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
So for an out of zone fault the current would flow from the phase terminals of the TX out to the fault, though the fault to earth, then back into the star point via the neutral on the TX. For an in zone fault both currents point in?

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

Yep.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
So why does the current change directions? What is feeding the fault if both the phase and neutral currents are pointing in toward an in zone fault?

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

Some remote source is now feeding the internal fault through the terminal CTs. If there is no remote source there may not be any current in through the terminals but there will still be current up through the neutral.

Why do you think that current through a set of CTs wouldn't change depending on which side of the CTs has the fault?

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
Davidbeach thank you for your perseverance. It's not that I don't think that the current would not change dependant on the location of the fault. Is more that I'm trying to work out how the currents flow in a faulted Tx. Please see my attached sketch. I thought that the fault current would have been developed by the faulted winding. What do you think of my faulted current path? The way that I see it is that the failed winding must still generate a voltage, and it's this voltage that sets up the fault current. Your thoughts?

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

Your red current is in the wrong direction. Ia may be zero if the isn't a remote source to supply it and if it isn't zero it would be toward the fault. Ib and Ic direction and magnitude depend on many things.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
So the faulted winding would produce the fault current?

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

The diagram is fine, as long as you are drawing the negative half cycle. Most of us would draw the arrow the other way to show the current in relation to the A phase voltage.

So turn the arrows around to stay with convention, and then draw it again for an out of zone fault. Also try it with a remote A phase LV source that also feeds both an in zone and out of zone fault.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
You say that the only time Ia would flow is if there were an external source? (in a faulted winding). That doesnt make sense to me as I would expect that the winding would still produce a voltage of some reduced quantity between the fault to earth and the A phase bushing? Or should I be thinking more along the lines of an ampere turns relationship between the primary and secondary, being that the fault current in the secondary would be so high as to consume all the available power transferred from the primary?

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

The only time Ia as measured by the a phase CT is if there is an external source feeding your in zone fault. Ia cannot be zero according to Kirchoff, but measured Ia depends on the CT location. The assumption is we are speaking of the quantity seen by the relay. Your diagram, with no external source, shows all the current bypassing the a phase CT.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
Thank you for your response, although I don't agree with it, reason being that the relay that I am testing (SEL787) requires zero sequence current to flow in the phase current CTs for polarisation. How could this be if it relies on an external source to supply this?

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
If the faulted power TX in question was supplying a delta connected distribution TX, wouldnt the healthy phases of the faulted TX then supply the fault via the delta on the distribution TX? Supplying zero sequence current back into the fault?
I think I have seen the light!

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

As shown, the CT is on the grounding jumper to the right of the neutral terminal. The CT will not see any line to neutral load current. The CT will see line to ground current.
For an example, consider the CT to the left of the terminal. The CT will now see all neutral current, both line to neutral and line to ground.
Now consider a variable load connected line to neutral on one phase. The neutral CT (now placed to the left of the terminal) will see this load current. Now increase the load. The current seen by the CT will increase.
Continue to increase the load until the load current reaches fault level. At no point will the current reverse.
Now reconnect the load from line to ground. Apply and increase the load. The results will be the same, no current reversal.
Now consider a winding fault on an unloaded transformer.
If we consider a fault at the 95% point on one winding, then we may simulate this by connecting our test load from a -5% tap to ground.
Same result. No reversal of current.
I accept that the OP saw a reversal of current.
I believe that the question is:
Why was the test set showing a current in reverse of the normal current before the test started??

Concerning delta connections:
If the transforme under test was feeding a wye:delta transformer with a four wire primary connection, it may be possible for the fault current to reverse.

CT position:
If the CT is to the right of the terminal as shown, the CT will see only ground currents.
If the CT is to the left of the terminal, the CT will see both ground and and line to neutral currents.

Another possible cause is if one of the test connections was inadvertently made to the neutral terminal rather than to the proper ground position. Such a connection may allow the fault current to split and part of the current to return via the grounding jumper (and CT) in the reverse direction.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

I should have used the word "bushing" rather than the word "terminal".
Recap:
Load curent and fault current are in the same direction.
Why were we seeing a reverse current before the application of the fault?

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

Read the logic diagram a bit more carefully. If insufficient current is available at the line CTs to provide polarization for a directional determination, the relay will still operate non-directionally based on summation alone. Had a 387 trip properly on REF just recently. Main breaker on the low side was open at the time, and the phase CTs were on the load side of the breaker.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
For clarification, all testing to this point has been by secondary injection. The current reversal was done to prove stability before a trip. I now understand that I have mistakenly reversed the neutral current and not the phase current.
I have had another look at the manual at figure 4.11 which is the enable logic for the REF element, and if I understand it correctly, requires 0.8 x the pick up setting in the polarising winding to enable it.
Please correct me if Im wrong, but wouldnt that mean that there needs to be zero sequence current flowing in the phase CTs to enable the element?
This is the crux of why i started this thread. So if you guys think you could see where Im going wrong here perhaps I might be able to cut down on the headache tablets. :)

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

In the SEL-787 manual (the one I'm looking at has a date code of 20140714) look at the paragraph above Figure 4.14. This explains how the REF function operates when there is no current at the terminals CTs. If you are dealing with a typical distribution transformer, that's about the only way that the REF will ever operate. If you're dealing with a transformer in the transmission system then you will probably have currents into the transformer through the terminals for an internal fault.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
Would you agree then looking at the logic diagram for this relay that the REF element would not operate without zero sequence current in the phase CTs?
It is used in the transmission system.
If delta/Wye transformers are used for distribution would you agree that current would flow back into the phase CT of the faulted phase on the transmission transformer?
Please see sketch in the next post.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

The relay WILL operate without zero sequence current in the phase CTs. It will operate with an open breaker, that's what the bypass logic in the cited paragraph is all about. In your diagram, where does the current in the wye side of the distribution transformer go? If it can't flow in the wye side then it can't flow in the delta side - the amp-turn balance between the two sides must be maintained.

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

(OP)
That it true that it will operate using the bypass logic, although in my case, the bypass logic has been disabled in the settings.
Why would there need to be current in the wye of the distribution transformer if the a phase on its delta has been effectively connected to earth by the fault in a phase of the faulted transmission transformer?

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

Transformer laws, no current in one coupled winding without a corresponding current in another winding in that coupled set. In the case of a delta-wye transformer there will be currents on both sides, the delta and the wye, and those currents will be related by the turns ratio of the transformer; in per unit the two sides will have the same current. If it can't flow on the wye side it simply won't flow on the delta side, no matter what.

Why on earth would you disable the bypass logic?

RE: Restricted Earth Fault Protection

Your latest sketch shows an ungrounded remote delta winding feeding back toward the ground fault. I see no way for this occur short of a simultaneous line to line fault on the secondary of the distribution transformer. If this truly represents your system, you still have no I0 at the phase CTs since the delta winding can only supply positive and negative sequence current. All the more reason not to bypass the bypass logic. If set as you say, your 787 REF element will remain secure for your in-zone winding to ground fault and you might as well leave the element disabled.

There is no way to disable the bypass logic in the relay. You can, however, map any relay word bit you like into a trip equation. Did you choose to map something other than REF1F to a trip equation? I would suggest you stick with REF1F so the bypass logic is used as intended.

I also suggest rotating the windings in your diagram so that winding currents will show as properly in phase. Then show your fault currents on the other sides of the transformers as well.



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources