×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

SEER 13
3

SEER 13

SEER 13

(OP)
Can any one tell me please if SEER 13 air conditioning systems are rated "high efficiency" equipments in the US and if they use only R410 refigerant?

RE: SEER 13

They used to be and some of the older SEER 13 systems used R22.
Air conditioning systems are now available with ratings up to SEER 16 , although a lot will depend on the installation to see if that efficiency is realized .
B.E.

You are judged not by what you know, but by what you can do.

RE: SEER 13

(OP)
Thanks Berkshire, actually I found there are alredy higher seers than 20, the matter here is that the contract I am supervising requires "high efficiency" A/C and I can`t find a standard that states which ones acomplish this requirement. All I found is that SEER 13 is the lowest range built nowadays in the US but some manufacturers offer SEER 13 as the lowest of their high efficiency models like: American Standard

RE: SEER 13

(OP)
Emerson says The minimum SEER rating is 13, with a rating above 16 considered high efficiency

RE: SEER 13

(OP)
Here is te final info, where is stated that 14.5 and above is considered high efficiency
Thanks

RE: SEER 13

Legally you can't require anything as the specs are not clear. It doesn't say "higher than legally required US efficiency", nor does it say a value. the designer should have specified a specific model with SEER 16 and R410A or whatever was desired. All you can get now is the code-required minimum.... I hops the specs state somewhere that all equipment needs to meet code?

You should go back to the "designer"and collect his design fee as that person clearly didn't design anything. Every housewife nowadays will know they want "high efficiency".

RE: SEER 13

(OP)
Yo are right thanks, shamely the designer will not help us anymore. He didn`t even mentioned the requirement to meet the code! so we will have to negotiate with the contractor

RE: SEER 13

I would recommend looking at ASHRAE 90.1, Table 6.8. A SEER of 13 would satisfy energy code. That would not be considered high efficiency, that would be minimal standard. Energy Star might be of use if you have rebates in your area.

RE: SEER 13

There is no correlation or relation between SEER and refrigerant. I presume you mean R410a, as there is no R410. R410a is the most common refrigerant used for residential applications currently. It's unlikely you would get equipment designed to use something else.

SEER 13 is apparently the minimum to get "Energy Star" label, and as noted by others above, the minimum allowed by law.

Since you seem to be working in the owner's interest your position should be "SEER 13 is the lowest allowed and there is much better available on the market. The lowest you can get is clearly not "high efficiency"".

RE: SEER 13

(OP)
My initial question was what´s the minimun SEER to consider an A/C system to be of high efficiency and I got the answer this morning from CEE´s
℠Commercial Unitary AC and HP Specification
Effective January 6, 2012
UNITARY AIR CONDITIONING SPECIFICATION"

Which states SEER 14 for comercial equipments below 6500 BTU with air colled units.
I apreciate all comments given, thank you

You may like the attachments

RE: SEER 13

This only applies if CEE is referenced in your specs. CEE isn't code. I think if you get code-minimum you can be lucky. if you are unlucky he digs out some cheap SEER 10 units and you need to pay to upgrade because building inspector will stop you.

RE: SEER 13

(OP)
Reading our specs ASHRAE and ACCA are specified, I will check them. I guess ASHRAE 90.1?

RE: SEER 13

(OP)
Ups, the project is EPC and the contractor offered "high efficiency" but ASHRAE does not define it, so we will try to push with CEE

RE: SEER 13

(OP)
How do you guys interprete this: "If you are replacing the air conditioner, look to buy high efficiency equipment. The most generally known efficiency rating is Seasonal Energy Efficiency Rating (SEER). SEER 13 is the minimum efficiency you should consider, but higher efficiencies are likely to be quite cost effective." from https://www.ashrae.org/resources--publications/fre... ?

RE: SEER 13

This language is useless in a contract. If you used it in specs, it tells the contractor to "look at" high efficiency equipment, not install it. He always can prove he "looked at it" as specified. and cost effective would be for him to install the cheapest. If you want SEER 16, just say SEER 16. that is legally defensible.

and it doesn't say to use SEER rating should be used, it says SEER exists, which contractually doesn't mean anything, it is like an informational note.

Contract language like that explains why the US is paradise for lawyers and the US has the largest ratio of attorneys in any country.

RE: SEER 13

Which states SEER 14 for comercial equipments below 6500 BTU with air colled units.

6500 BTH/hr is basically a window air conditioner.

RE: SEER 13

(OP)
Yes it´s a legal matter, and as the contractor stataed ASHRAE as the base for his design and I could not find ASHRAE to specify what is high efficiency, I emailed ASHRAE asking for it... I will let you know their answer

RE: SEER 13

if the contract says ASHRAE as basis of design, are you indicating the contractor was to design (design-build)? You mentioned you had an engineer, what did he do if this is design-build? If it was design-bid-build (as in you had an engineer designing and then bid it out) this would be the owner/engineer responsibility to clearly state a SEER number. The contractor can't be asked to design in such situation.

Just look for what the contractor proposes to use on his own. Maybe it is SEER 13 and you are good. No need to argue with them before you know what they intend.

RE: SEER 13

Code has to be followed by a law even though the designer didn't mention it, project has to be reviewed by the city hall, in your case you can ask the contractor to bring a letter from the equipment manufacturer saying that their product meet all the current regulations requirements, and I don't think the manufacturer will sell equipment do not meet any bylaw requirements, if you go now to a manufacturer and ask them to buy a R22 equipment they will tell you sorry we can't sell it to you.

RE: SEER 13

(OP)
You are quite right 317069 thanks we will ask for the manufactrer letter.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources