×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

R value question

R value question

R value question

(OP)
I am working with a client who is looking to add on to his existing building that was built in 2000. The existing building is 100’ wide x 400’ long and is built using a proprietary bearing system. After running through some quick calculations I have concluded that the code required wind loads are approximately the same as they were 15 years ago.

The problem I have is in regards to seismic loads. The client is adding another 50’ wide x 400’ long addition to the building (increasing the area of his building by 50%). The existing drawings indicate R=3.5 which I believed corresponded to a Load bearing wall system of concentrically braced frames (I think this is from the old BOCCA Code). What type of system would this correspond to today utilizing IBC 2009 and ASCE7-05? I leaning towards an ordinary steel concentrically braced frame system, as they utilize steel members within their panels, but I am not sure if this is correct.

Any insight on this is appreciated.

RE: R value question

ASCE 7 2010 uses an R of 3.25 for concentric braced frames. However, brace connections must be designed for omega level forces, where omega is 2. See table 12.2-1. See section 12.4.3.2 for load combinations with omega. Basically this means you will have to design the connections for twice the seismic load.

The other approach is to use an omega of 3 and most of the seismic detailing requirements can be ignored. You can only use the R=3 approach for Seismic Design Categories A, B or C.

RE: R value question

(OP)
The problem I have with that approach is the fact that I am increasing the seismic loads beyond what the system was designed for.

I guess I have two options:

1) Run an analysis on the existing structure with the new loads and hope reinforcing is not required (yeah right).

2) Keep the new structure independent from the existing.

The problem with item #2 is the diaphragm ration of the building which is 8:1 as I can not add bracing inside of the building.... and the client doesn't want to add bracing outside of the building.

Not going to be easy.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources