×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Torsion differential equation

Torsion differential equation

Torsion differential equation

(OP)
hey everyone,

i have a channel beam under a linearly varying torsional moment

my question is:

given the torsion differential equation written as:
phi''[x] - [E*Jw/(G*Jt)]phi''''[x] = -[mx/(G*Jt)]

how must it be written for a load like the one in the attached figure?

in other words, what "mx" should i use? or should i divide the beam in half? i've tried several things but the solutions came out "suspicious" every time.

RE: Torsion differential equation

you can use a singularity function to describe it. I think if m(x) = To + ((Tm-To)/(L/2))*x - 2*((Tm-To)/(L/2))*(x-(L/2))*<x-(L/2)>^0 that might do it.

RE: Torsion differential equation

I'd study half the beam considering it to be torsionally pinned at x=0 and torsionally fixed at x=L/2. Symmetry is your friend here.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Torsion differential equation

(OP)
"I'd study half the beam considering it to be torsionally pinned at x=0 and torsionally fixed at x=L/2."

Why?

the case i'm studying is torsionally fixed at both ends (phi = 0) and in two separate scenarios it can be warping fixed (phi' = 0) and warping free (phi'' = 0)

i've tried to divide it in half considering phi(0)=phi'(0)=0 and phi'(L/2)=0 but the results were not good

RE: Torsion differential equation

Why = for the half span model, moment is a continuous function that can be handled relatively easily. If you deal with the beam in its entirety, you'll need a moment function that deals with the discontinuity at L/2. That's mathematically a bit trickier. You'll basically end up having to deal with two functions that get combined at some point. I believe that structSU10's solution is in this vein.

Be careful with torsional fixity. It requires rotation restraint and warping restraint. Regardless of your boundary condition at the real supports, torsional fixity can be assumed at L/2 in a half span model.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Torsion differential equation

(OP)
that's what i don't understand. Warping fixity is pretty obvious, but why rotation fixity can be assumed at midlength in a half span model? i've seen that kind of solution somewhere but i didn't understood why that can be done.

RE: Torsion differential equation

You've kinda got me wondering about that now too. I'll noodle on it.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.

RE: Torsion differential equation

Isn't that because the rotation on each side of the point at L/2 is the same?

But that's just something that quickly popped into my head, I'm no solid mechanics expert.

RE: Torsion differential equation

Instead of pouring that kind of time into it......why not make the torque=Tm along the full length and check it that way (there are spreadsheets/programs that can do that in seconds).

That is, unless this is a existing member that you are trying to make work/pass under a new load.

RE: Torsion differential equation

this is almost anti-symmetric ... zero twist at one end, some CW twist in the middle, zero twist at the other end.

it'd react the same way if if were a constant moment (ie zero-some-zero twist) ... the amount of twist is likely to be higher for the tapering torque.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Torsion differential equation

another way to look at the problem is a set of discrete torques ... as a way to sanity check the distributed loading results.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: Torsion differential equation

(OP)
so, this is what i've been trying:

I divided the beam in half and at L/2 applied warping fixity (but free rotation) so now i just have 3 boundary conditions

for the left part:
phi'[x] - [E*Jw/(G*Jt)]phi'''[x] = Tm (2 (1 - b) x/L + b)/(G*Jt), phi[0] = 0, phi'[0] = 0, phi'[L/2] = 0

and for the right part:
phi'[x] - [E*Jw/(G*Jt)]phi'''[x] = -Tm (2 (1 - b) (L - x)/L + b)/(G*Jt), phi[L] = 0, phi'[L] = 0, phi'[L/2] = 0

where b is T0/Tm.

The results now seem plausible but i don't know for sure if they are correct

what do you guys think about this?

RE: Torsion differential equation

Did you try a singularity function? it creates a continuous function out of it. here is a link to its explanation if you didn't get what I wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity_function

it is a very easy way to accommodate difficult functions. I'm not sure how it shakes out for torsional functions, but for beam functions it works quite well.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources