×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Is a vacuum test enough for a leak free tank bottom?

Is a vacuum test enough for a leak free tank bottom?

Is a vacuum test enough for a leak free tank bottom?

(OP)
How to be sure to have a leak free api tank bottom?. May be MT or PT will complement. In a ring type beam wall support is not easy to detect any leak, unless you have a membrane and leak detectors between bottom plate and soil, in our case we did not have membrane for the water tank.
I will appreciate your answers.
Luis

RE: Is a vacuum test enough for a leak free tank bottom?

A properly conducted vacuum box test will complement the visual inspection and greatly minimize the occurrence of leaks. The personnel conducting the test must take their time and record areas already covered so that there are no areas neglected. I have found that collaboration between inspection and fabrication/erection is key to overlooking minor concerns which may have major consequences.

RE: Is a vacuum test enough for a leak free tank bottom?

For added leak-free weld assurance, PT works pretty well. It takes a looong time, the spray developer iv flammable [liquid, not the white stuff], and the indications it finds will be many, many. Almost zero 'Tankie' floor welders have the ability to lay hundreds and hundreds of feet of flaw-free welds. Plan on having a BUNCH of 'pick-ups' minor repairs to make. But PT will find "half a hole" - flaws that are significant, but not thru-wall yet, so they do not show while vac-boxing. There is a middle ground between vac-boxing and PTing. Use the vac-box, AND give every inch of weld a stringent visual inspx. Use a strong, focused light[but not to the point of washing out fine details] held at a VERY oblique angle. Reject all the 'piping'* porosity you see.

MT is useless in finding tiny, rounded defects. It will show them, but you won't be able to tell the difference between a valid indication and a tiny, incidental clump of MT particles.

*Piping Porosity has no visible bottom. Too deep to see where it quits.

RE: Is a vacuum test enough for a leak free tank bottom?

Agree with what Duwe6 mentioned but again you could be there for weeks chasing indications out and hopefully you get a good technician who knows PT. You get just anyone and you already increased your workload. You could suggest to PT a certain percentage of the seams/welders along with the vacuum box and visual inspection you should already be doing. Most NDE outfits should also be able to provide you with the correct radius corner box for the floor-to-shell weld as well.



Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources