×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

(OP)
Does anyone know of a method to check the stress in the tubes of a heat exchanger when lifting the unit from horizontal to vertical when there is a thin bellows expansion joint in the shell? I know the tubes will take the load but is there a method to determine the load on the tubes?

Thanks

Tomtation

RE: Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

Well yeah, beam type bending. I'd lock down the bellows though.

Regards,

Mike

RE: Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

Do NOT cut the 'shipping bars' on the bellows joint until your Hx is set, the pipes connected and pipe stress verified. I prefer to only cut out the center half of each bar, leaving both ends. That way, if the Hx needs moved later, some angle-iron can be easily welded across that gap, and no welding heat will reach the shell or bellows.

RE: Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

(OP)
My contention is that in most cases there is no need for shipping bars on the expansion joint for lifting the unit from the horizontal position because the tubes will take the load (not the expansion joint). Please refer to the attached sample calculations and let me know what you think.

Thanks
Tomtation

RE: Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

Tomtation, ever seen one blow up?

RE: Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

(OP)
No, why have you?

Someone smarter than I pointed out that my proposed method is invalid because the tubes do not act in unison to resist the shear flow due to the bending moment. So I'm back to square one.

RE: Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

Yeah, I have, bottom unit of a horizontal stack. Supports no aligned. Takes only a small eccentricity in loading or geometry of the joint to cause problems. What's the problem with shipping or maintenance braces?

Regards,

Mike

RE: Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

(OP)
There is no problem adding shipping brackets but I'm just not convinced that they are required in most cases.
Thanks for your comments.

Regards

Tom

RE: Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

Tomtation, I don't generally feel that lucky :)

RE: Calculation of tube stresses when lifting a heat exchanger with a thin bellows

Remember: The shipping brackets are only sized to prevent the bellows and the two bellow attachment rings from moving relative to one another during "normal" - ie, very, very careful - lifting, shipping and handling.

Sure, they are probably a little oversized. But those things are NOT intended to prevent the movement of the entire heat exchanger and both ends and both tubesheets (or one end and one tubesheet and all of the tubes in the bundle.)

the tube bundle, as pointed out above, will not act as a single "reinforced mass of tubes" but as a very large of loosely sliding individual tubes each contacting the loose hole in the tubesheet and spreader plates one at a time. So, the first tube hits the tube sheet hole, picks up all the weight stress (because it is the first to touch and begin resisting the bending force) and so deforms (kinks. The second touches, deforms, and kinks. The third, the fourth, etc. Eventually of course, enough tubes have kinked so the 331st is not kinked.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources