×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Concrete Column Unsupported Length

Concrete Column Unsupported Length

Concrete Column Unsupported Length

(OP)
I am double checking what the standard practice is for determining the unsupported length of a concrete column on the first storey of a building (without getting in to anything like horizontal soil springs, etc) .

I have a situation where my footing was lowered about 9' below the slab on grade to accommodate some piping. Is the unsupported length from:
A) the underside of the slab to the top of the footing
or
B) the underside of Level 2 slab to the slab-on-grade. The slab-on-grade is 5" thick with mesh and the soil is properly compacted.

RE: Concrete Column Unsupported Length

I would consider the below grade member to be a pier, not a column--braced in all directions.

DaveAtkins

RE: Concrete Column Unsupported Length

Sounds like the pier is also the column; is it continuous from the footing to level 2?

If that is the case than both would be the unbraced length but worst case I think would be B. But you can only use the slab as lateral support if it is tied into the column with reinforcing.

RE: Concrete Column Unsupported Length

I vote option 2.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Concrete Column Unsupported Length

I would actually go 3' below slab on ground as the point of lateral restraint. And I am saying this because I guess most of the lateral restraint of the footing would come from friction at the base more than the passive resistance of the soil.

And I would use 3' because that seems to be a common assumption where fixity is assumed for the lateral restraint of piles.

RE: Concrete Column Unsupported Length

(OP)
Thanks asixth, I think that is a valid assumption

RE: Concrete Column Unsupported Length

With the 3' below grade assumption, would that be considered a fixed base at that level (K~0.7)? Or pinned (K~1.0)?

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Concrete Column Unsupported Length

I would use a K towards 1.

I would rely on the soil to provide the lateral restraint required but wouldn't try to create a rotational fixity of the column.

RE: Concrete Column Unsupported Length

asixth's assumption is similar to my thought process for this type situation. I wouldn't assume a brace point by the slab on grade.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources