×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

(OP)
Just wondering what are some possible ways we can go about testing our foam fire protection system without filling the entire building with foam. Or is this the only way?

RE: Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

It's one of the only ways you can do it correctly.

If you measure the flow at each generator you can extrapolate the consumption rate of foam concentrate and validate the duration and flow.

RE: Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

How was it tested when it was installed and accepted?

If it is a low expansion say 3-6% foam system install piping after the foam inductor to a test header. Flow water via the test header at the required GPM when reached turn on the foam and take sample to determine the % of foam. Check with your environment agency some will require you to collect the foam, others will permit it to be discharged to a drain and or seep into the ground.

RE: Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

Acceptance, and subsequent testing after that is one of the main problems with aqueous foam systems. Most system are therefore not tested properly. A relatively new system is out that uses air - air/compressed foam = ACAF for example. I am not sure if it will work for your application, but if you google it, you can find more.

RE: Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

(OP)
Thanks guys.. Looking into a few details with it now.
It is not currently installed yet, the building is still under construction.
One of the ideas we have thrown around (still haven't done the research yet) is once line is finished, to first test out the sprinkler system with water to verify flow and ensure they are the same within acceptance.
We could then test one sprinkler with foam to determine the coverage and it's spray pattern and then hoard the other ones to prevent the entire building from filling.
The idea of a test header also sounds ideal.

RE: Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

Low, medium or high expansion foam? What's driving the requirement for the foam-H2O system? I ask because I had a designer recently tell me that for a new private aircraft hanger that high-expansion foam was required and after researching the 2012 IFC and NFPA 40-something I figured out sprinklers were an option.

RE: Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

(OP)
Both high and low expansion foam. It's a chemical building with various tanks settlers and mixers.
high expansion will be used for ground floor and operations where low is for any trenches and inside the tanks.

RE: Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

I will let you figure out what is best for your project, but you may want to look at compressed air foam. You wont have the discharge test issues you are concerned with. I am definitely not a subject matter on foam, but I did some prelim research about 6 months ago on it and wrote an initial design spec for a foam system. It is <FM> approved, and can be used for flammable liquids. The project we had involved very low fp liquids in plastic containers, so we had to have foam, since water alone would not cut it. But, the project was cancelled early on so it did not go through.

RE: Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

Without doing more research I would be hesitant on CAFS for flammable liquids. I suspect with CAFS your foam quantities are reduced due to a lower concentration. However, the higher concentration one is required to have using a conventional AFFF or AFFF-ATC provides higher surface shear which increases the breakthrough times. This issue as extensively studied several years ago by an API task group.

I know nothing about your process chemistry or unit operations to make any conclusive statements. However, I am concerned about mixing a High-expansion foam system with a low-expansion foam system. The design approach and equipment requirements are different and I'm not sure how these two methods would work under a fire condition. I also have concerns if this equipment is all in one building or area where the unit process is combined together. I wouldn't want to be an operator trying to wade through high-expansion foam while moving through a process area.

With this process being indoors your unit processes may be a candidate for using optical flame detection and motor operated valves to isolate process feedstock and finished product piping when a fire signature is detected. This combined with conventional sprinkler protection for controlling the fire and cooling process equipment may offer higher reliability and lower ITM costs.

RE: Testing/Commissioning of a Foam Fire Protection system

Stookey,, as noted, I am not a foam expert but did some prelim research about this in the past. The research folks at FM who do know foam very well have approved CAF for low flash point flammable liquids. Their testing processes are very thorough and methodical and often more restrictive than other codes and agencies.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources