cutting parallelism
cutting parallelism
(OP)
today i cut 10mm steel (s355jr) the cut is good but after measuring the piece the top side is almost perfect, 60.00mm from drawing 59.98mm measured really good) but the bottom of the piece in smaller, ideal must be 60.00mm but measured is 59.66~59.75mm if you measuer in different point. how can i adjust this?
machine is a trumpf 3050 year 2004 with all mirrors and resonator new replaced 2 months ago and cutting conditions are standar trump (no value modified)
machine is a trumpf 3050 year 2004 with all mirrors and resonator new replaced 2 months ago and cutting conditions are standar trump (no value modified)





RE: cutting parallelism
RE: cutting parallelism
Have you checked focus?
TTFN

FAQ731-376: Eng-Tips.com Forum Policies
Need help writing a question or understanding a reply? forum1529: Translation Assistance for Engineers
Of course I can. I can do anything. I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert!
RE: cutting parallelism
don't know if autolas mirror is ok.
there is no "before" :) or i don't know if the machine works correctly where it was first installed.
how to check focus?
if u refer to a program that cut a "comb" in aisi 1mm were check the gap and adjust the "mechanical zero" , the 7.5" head is out of focus according to the test but trumpf technician say "the test is useless" set the zero with caliper following the trumpf table" and give me the measure to set the mechanical focus from the hole on the top at the side of the "laser hole"
RE: cutting parallelism
What he said to do is set your zero with the caliper then run the focus test to see where the lens is to set the optical focus is. and to use a trumpf lens to set it up. your lens might be off
RE: cutting parallelism
RE: cutting parallelism
RE: cutting parallelism
I have marked where the "spessimetro" (in italian, i don't know its name in english, sorry) don't enter the gap.
RE: cutting parallelism
RE: cutting parallelism
RE: cutting parallelism
RE: cutting parallelism
By enlarging beam diameter i have to lower the Speed?
RE: cutting parallelism
RE: cutting parallelism
tryed to enlarge beam to 18mm (13 original) and pieces will be welded on bottom side.
thanks to all
RE: cutting parallelism
Chris Krug http://krugtech.com/
Maximum Up-time, Minimum BS