×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Loading on PT slab before grouting
2

Loading on PT slab before grouting

Loading on PT slab before grouting

(OP)
Hi all,

Main contractor want to operate a mobile crane on our Post-tensioned slab before grouting.

(1) I'm gonna check the slab as unbonded with lower concrete grade to match the actual strength later.
(2) What about the min As? The strands were counted as min As in the first place. Anyway the software will calculate min As for me :D.
(3) I will check punching shear. Will ask them to provide steel plates.

In here structural consultants or QP, they want the grout compression strength to be the same as the slab/beams concrete grade. But in the code CP 65, the requirement is only 27 MPa. Is there any particular reason to be the same? Anyway the grout is normally in the tension zone.

Thanks

RE: Loading on PT slab before grouting

This sounds like a reasonable approach to me.

Quote (OP)

(2) What about the min As?

In most respects, I think that you're still satisfying the intent of As_min.

Quote (OP)

Is there any particular reason to be the same?

I'm not familiar with the documents you've referenced but don't see why the grout must match the slab strength. The grout's main job is to transfer bond stress between the cables and the ducts. Development length calculations should reflect the actual grout strength however.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Loading on PT slab before grouting

I too am not familiar with your code documents, and you do not state if this is a PT flat slab, plate, 2-way slab, slab/beam.

If this is a banded-uniform tendon flat plate design (which I doubt as it is grouted and therefore likely outside the USA) be careful about distributing large random-placement point loads in these type of systems.

Does the PT slab have additional BONDED rebar for flexure - like a partial prestress design?

As min. is usually codified as minimum BONDED reinforcement, so if your Ap (area of prestress) qualifies as As min. then until the tendons are grouted Ap does not satisfy As min.

Also, the stress in the prestress at ultimate flexural capacity will NOT be based upon strain compatibility, so you will have to check fps based upon empirical formulas, like those obtained in ACI 318, for example.

Like KootK stated, grout is for bond transfer and also corrosion protection - seldom is grout sampling and testing done on building-type structures, so this seems overkill to have f'c grout=f'c conc.

Make sure the contractor giving you the mobile crane loading info gets you axle/wheel loads (whilst crane is traversing the slab), and also the maximum outrigger loadings (under calculated lift conditions).

RE: Loading on PT slab before grouting

Make sure there are no outrigger loads allowed as this will raise serious shear issues.

Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)


RE: Loading on PT slab before grouting

Yep, this photo is from Sydney, Australia. Bonded PT band beam and slab system (not yet grouted). Outrigger punched through slab, then see-sawed for about an hour, then crane tipped...FAIL

Crane was only 9 days old (probably about the same age as the slab!). Crane purchase price was AU$4M. Shoring/back props are way less expensive.

No one hurt, except egos and pride.

RE: Loading on PT slab before grouting

The 200mm thick PT slab (composite metal deck as soffit formwork) was shored (twin SuperSlim HD props) but the outrigger placement vs shoring placement was the straw...

RE: Loading on PT slab before grouting

Sweet pics Inginuity. I've saved those to my hard drive to use for scaring contractors witless in the future.

I know that you do a lot more PT than I do so I'll take your word for it on the minimum As business. For the sake of my own education, can you explain to me what the issue with that is? My understanding is that un-bonded PT can serve as T&S reinforcement. And strength concerns should be obviated by the fact that OP is doing a separate, un-bonded design check.

The greatest trick that bond stress ever pulled was convincing the world it didn't exist.

RE: Loading on PT slab before grouting

KootK,

For UNbonded PT:

Quote (ACI 318)

R18.9.1 — Some bonded reinforcement is required by the
code in members prestressed with unbonded tendons to ensure
flexural performance at ultimate member strength, rather than
as a tied arch, and to limit crack width and spacing at service
load when concrete tensile stresses exceed the modulus of rupture.
Providing the minimum bonded reinforcement as stipulated
in 18.9 helps to ensure adequate performance.

It is usually more economic to provide a PT framing solution with rebar too, rather than a "fully" prestressed design.

RE: Loading on PT slab before grouting

(OP)
Hi Ingenuity
I will get the info from the contractor.

For my own education and knowledge, how can I compute the outrigger load and pad?

I saw one formula before in this forum.

Load at each outrigger foot = 0.6 x (crane weight + lifted load)/area of each outrigger. Is it accurate enough?

BTW, nice photo I've saved them too.

Hi KootK/Ingenuity
I also don't understand why they want fc'grout = fc'slab. Maybe they don't know about PT and just trying to play safe.

In Singapore, we are using CP65. If I am not wrong, it is exactly the same as BS 8110.

Thanks for your enlightening replies.

RE: Loading on PT slab before grouting

Cranes manufacturers will normally provide you with max outrigger loads. For a crane that size I reckon it would be at least 300kN.

Needed to do a better job marking out the megashores. Even just moving the crane across the slab without adequate backpropping would have been risky.

And there would be no need for a crane that size if it was to erect steelwork. I reckon it would have been there to lift the precast panels.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources